Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停患者的早期与晚期节律分析。

Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 1;365(9):787-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010076.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a departure from the previous strategy of immediate defibrillation, the 2005 resuscitation guidelines from the American Heart Association-International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation suggested that emergency medical service (EMS) personnel could provide 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before the first analysis of cardiac rhythm. We compared the strategy of a brief period of CPR with early analysis of rhythm with the strategy of a longer period of CPR with delayed analysis of rhythm.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster-randomized trial involving adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at 10 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium sites in the United States and Canada. Patients in the early-analysis group were assigned to receive 30 to 60 seconds of EMS-administered CPR and those in the later-analysis group were assigned to receive 180 seconds of CPR, before the initial electrocardiographic analysis. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with satisfactory functional status (a modified Rankin scale score of ≤3, on a scale of 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability).

RESULTS

We included 9933 patients, of whom 5290 were assigned to early analysis of cardiac rhythm and 4643 to later analysis. A total of 273 patients (5.9%) in the later-analysis group and 310 patients (5.9%) in the early-analysis group met the criteria for the primary outcome, with a cluster-adjusted difference of -0.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -1.1 to 0.7; P=0.59). Analyses of the data with adjustment for confounding factors, as well as subgroup analyses, also showed no survival benefit for either study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we found no difference in the outcomes with a brief period, as compared with a longer period, of EMS-administered CPR before the first analysis of cardiac rhythm. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ROC PRIMED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00394706.).

摘要

背景

与之前立即除颤的策略不同,美国心脏协会-国际复苏联合会 2005 年的复苏指南建议,在首次分析心脏节律之前,急救医疗服务(EMS)人员可以先进行 2 分钟的心肺复苏(CPR)。我们比较了短暂 CPR 加早期节律分析与较长 CPR 加延迟节律分析这两种策略。

方法

我们在美国和加拿大的 10 个复苏结果联合会(ROC)站点进行了一项涉及院外心脏骤停的成年患者的集群随机试验。早期分析组的患者被分配接受 30 至 60 秒的 EMS 实施的 CPR,而后期分析组的患者则被分配接受 180 秒的 CPR,然后再进行初始心电图分析。主要结果是存活至出院且功能状态良好(改良 Rankin 量表评分≤3,评分为 0 至 6,分数越高表示残疾程度越高)。

结果

我们纳入了 9933 名患者,其中 5290 名被分配到心脏节律的早期分析组,4643 名被分配到后期分析组。后期分析组中有 273 名患者(5.9%)和早期分析组中有 310 名患者(5.9%)达到了主要结局的标准,两组之间的差异为-0.2 个百分点(95%置信区间,-1.1 至 0.7;P=0.59)。对混杂因素进行调整后的数据分析以及亚组分析也显示,两组患者均无生存获益。

结论

在院外心脏骤停患者中,我们发现与首次分析心脏节律前较长时间的 EMS 实施的 CPR 相比,较短时间的 CPR 并没有带来更好的结果。(由美国国立心肺血液研究所和其他机构资助;ROC PRIMED ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00394706。)

相似文献

9
Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR.心肺复苏期间持续或间断胸外按压的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2203-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509139. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

3
Randomized controlled trials in resuscitation.复苏方面的随机对照试验。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 29;18:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100582. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
[Basic life support].[基础生命支持]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):386-405. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00885-x. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验