Hamel M B, Phillips R S, Davis R B, Teno J, Connors A F, Desbiens N, Lynn J, Dawson N V, Fulkerson W, Tsevat J
Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Med. 2000 Dec 1;109(8):614-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00591-x.
Many patients with acute respiratory failure die despite prolonged and costly treatment. Our objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of providing rather than withholding mechanical ventilation and intensive care for patients with acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome.
We studied 1,005 patients enrolled in a five-center study of seriously ill patients (the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments [SUPPORT]) with acute respiratory failure (pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome and an Acute Physiology Score > or =10) who required ventilator support. We estimated life expectancy based on long-term follow-up of SUPPORT patients. Utilities were estimated using time-tradeoff questions. Costs (in 1998 dollars) were based on hospital fiscal data and Medicare data.
Of the 963 patients who received ventilator support, 48% survived for at least 6 months. At 6 months, survivors reported a median of 1 dependence in activities of daily living, and 72% rated their quality of life as good, very good, or excellent. Among the 42 patients in whom ventilator support was withheld, the median survival was 3 days. Among patients whose estimated probability of surviving at least 2 months from the time of ventilator support ("prognostic estimate") was 70% or more, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved by providing rather than withholding ventilator support and aggressive care was $29,000. For medium-risk patients (prognostic estimate 51% to 70%), the incremental cost-effectiveness was $44,000 per QALY, and for high-risk patients (prognostic estimate < or =50%), it was $110,000 per QALY. When assumptions were varied from 50% to 200% of baseline estimates, the results ranged from $19,000 to $48,000 for low-risk patients, from $29,000 to $76, 000 for medium-risk patients, and from $67,000 to $200,000 for high-risk patients.
Ventilator support and intensive care for acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome are relatively cost-effective for patients with >50% probability of surviving 2 months. However, for patients with an expected 2-month survival < or =50%, the cost per QALY is more than threefold greater at >$100,000.
许多急性呼吸衰竭患者尽管接受了长期且昂贵的治疗仍死亡。我们的目标是评估为因肺炎或急性呼吸窘迫综合征导致急性呼吸衰竭的患者提供机械通气和重症监护而非不予治疗的成本效益。
我们研究了1005名参加一项五中心重症患者研究(了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究[SUPPORT])的急性呼吸衰竭(肺炎或急性呼吸窘迫综合征且急性生理评分≥10)且需要呼吸机支持的患者。我们基于对SUPPORT患者的长期随访来估计预期寿命。使用时间权衡问题来估计效用值。成本(以1998年美元计)基于医院财务数据和医疗保险数据。
在963名接受呼吸机支持的患者中,48%存活至少6个月。在6个月时,存活者报告日常生活活动的中位依赖程度为1级,72%将其生活质量评为良好、非常好或优秀。在42名未接受呼吸机支持的患者中,中位生存期为3天。在从开始呼吸机支持时起存活至少2个月的估计概率(“预后估计”)为70%或更高的患者中,提供而非不予呼吸机支持和积极治疗每挽救一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本为29,000美元。对于中度风险患者(预后估计为51%至70%),每QALY的增量成本效益为44,000美元,对于高风险患者(预后估计≤50%),为每QALY 110,000美元。当假设在基线估计的50%至200%之间变化时,低风险患者的结果在19,000美元至48,000美元之间,中度风险患者在29,000美元至76,000美元之间,高风险患者在67,000美元至200,000美元之间。
对于存活2个月概率大于50%的因肺炎或急性呼吸窘迫综合征导致急性呼吸衰竭的患者,呼吸机支持和重症监护相对具有成本效益。然而,对于预期2个月生存率≤50%的患者,每QALY的成本超过100,000美元,高出三倍多。