School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Center for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084816.
The Chinese community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline 2020 recommends quinolone antibiotics as the initial empirical treatment options for CAP. However, patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are often misdiagnosed with CAP because of the similarity of symptoms. Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin have inhibitory effects on mycobacterium tuberculosis as compared with nemonoxacin, resulting in delayed diagnosis of PTB. Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of CAP and to determine the value of these treatments in the differential diagnosis of PTB. Primary efficacy data were collected from phase II-III randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to moxifloxacin (CTR20130195) and nemonoxacin to levofloxacin (CTR20140439) for the treatment of Chinese CAP patients. A decision tree was constructed to compare the cost-utility among three groups under the perspective of healthcare system. The threshold for willingness to pay (WTP) is 1-3 times GDP per capita ($11,174-33,521). Scenarios including efficacy and cost for CAP patients with a total of 6% undifferentiated PTB. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of basic analysis. The costs of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin were $903.72, $1053.59, and $1212.06 and the outcomes were 188.7, 188.8, and 188.5 quality-adjusted life days (QALD), respectively. Nemonoxacin and moxifloxacin were dominant compared with levofloxacin, and the ICER of moxifloxacin compared with nemonoxacin was $551,643, which was much greater than WTP; therefore, nemonoxacin was the most cost-effective option. Regarding patients with PTB who were misdiagnosed with CAP, taking nemonoxacin could save $290.76 and $205.51 when compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin and resulted in a gain of 2.83 QALDs. Our findings demonstrate that nemonoxacin is the more economical compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin, and non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics are cost-saving and utility-increasing compared to fluoroquinolones in the differential diagnosis of PTB, which can help healthcare system in making optimal policies and help clinicians in the medication of patients.
《中国成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南 2020》推荐喹诺酮类抗生素作为 CAP 的初始经验性治疗选择。然而,由于症状相似,肺结核(PTB)患者常被误诊为 CAP。莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星对结核分枝杆菌的抑制作用强于奈诺沙星,导致 PTB 的诊断延迟。因此,本研究旨在比较奈诺沙星、莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星治疗 CAP 的成本效益,并确定这些治疗方法在 PTB 鉴别诊断中的价值。主要疗效数据来自比较奈诺沙星与莫西沙星(CTR20130195)和奈诺沙星与左氧氟沙星(CTR20140439)治疗中国 CAP 患者的 II-III 期随机、双盲、多中心临床试验。基于医疗保健系统的角度,构建决策树来比较三组之间的成本效用。意愿支付(WTP)的阈值为 1-3 倍人均国内生产总值($11174-33521)。包括总共有 6%未分化 PTB 的 CAP 患者的疗效和成本的方案。对基本分析进行了敏感性和方案分析,以测试其稳健性。奈诺沙星、莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星的成本分别为$903.72、$1053.59 和$1212.06,结果分别为 188.7、188.8 和 188.5 个质量调整生命日(QALD)。奈诺沙星和莫西沙星均优于左氧氟沙星,莫西沙星与奈诺沙星的 ICER 为$551643,远高于 WTP;因此,奈诺沙星是最具成本效益的选择。对于被误诊为 CAP 的 PTB 患者,与莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星相比,使用奈诺沙星可分别节省$290.76 和$205.51,并获得 2.83 个 QALD 的收益。我们的研究结果表明,与莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星相比,奈诺沙星更经济实惠,而非氟喹诺酮类抗生素在 PTB 的鉴别诊断中具有成本节约和效用增加的作用,这有助于医疗保健系统制定最佳政策,并帮助临床医生为患者提供药物治疗。