Cunningham W E, Markson L E, Andersen R M, Crystal S H, Fleishman J A, Golin C, Gifford A, Liu H H, Nakazono T T, Morton S, Bozzette S A, Shapiro M F, Wenger N S
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000 Oct 1;25(2):115-23. doi: 10.1097/00042560-200010010-00005.
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) became standard for HIV in 1996. Studies at that time showed that most people infected with HIV had initiated HAART, but that members of minority groups and poor people had lower HAART use. It is not known whether high levels of HAART use have been sustained or whether socioeconomic and racial disparities have diminished over time.
To determine the proportion of patients who had received and were receiving HAART by January 1998, and to evaluate predictors of HAART receipt.
Prospective cohort study of a national probability sample of 2267 adults receiving HIV care who completed baseline, first follow-up, and second follow-up interviews from January 1996 to January 1998.
Proportion currently using HAART at second follow-up (August 1997 to January 1998), contrasted with the cumulative proportions using HAART at any time before January 1998 and before December 1996.
Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis of population characteristics predicting current use of HAART at the time of the second follow-up interview.
The proportion of patients ever having received HAART increased from 37% in December 1996 to 71% by January 1998, but only 53% of people were receiving HAART at the time of the second follow-up interview. Differences between sociodemographic groups in ever using HAART narrowed after 1996. In bivariate analysis, several groups remained significantly less likely to be using HAART at the time of the second follow-up interview: blacks, male and female drug users, female heterosexuals, people with less education, those uninsured and insured by Medicaid, those in the Northeast, and those with CD4 counts of >/=500 cells/microl (all p <.05). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, low CD4 count (for CD4 <50 cells/microl: odds ratio [OR], 3.20; p <.001) remained a significant predictor of current HAART use at the time of the second follow-up interview, but lack of insurance (OR, 0.71; p <.05) predicted not receiving HAART.
The proportion of persons under HIV care in the United States who had ever received HAART increased to over 70% of the affected population by January 1998 and the disparities in use between groups narrowed but did not disappear. However, nearly half of those eligible for HAART according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines were not actually receiving it nearly 2 years after these medications were first introduced. Strategies to promote the initiation and continuation of HAART are needed for those without contraindications and those who can tolerate it.
高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)于1996年成为治疗HIV的标准疗法。当时的研究表明,大多数感染HIV的人已开始接受HAART治疗,但少数群体成员和贫困人口的HAART使用率较低。目前尚不清楚HAART的高使用率是否持续,以及社会经济和种族差异是否随时间而减少。
确定截至1998年1月接受并正在接受HAART治疗的患者比例,并评估接受HAART治疗的预测因素。
对2267名接受HIV治疗的成年人进行全国概率抽样的前瞻性队列研究,这些患者在1996年1月至1998年1月期间完成了基线、首次随访和第二次随访访谈。
第二次随访(1997年8月至1998年1月)时目前正在使用HAART的比例,与1998年1月之前以及1996年12月之前任何时间使用HAART的累积比例进行对比。
对第二次随访访谈时预测当前HAART使用情况的人口特征进行双变量和多因素逻辑回归分析。
接受过HAART治疗的患者比例从1996年12月的37%增至1998年1月的71%,但在第二次随访访谈时,只有53%的人正在接受HAART治疗。1996年后,社会人口学群体在使用HAART方面的差异有所缩小。在双变量分析中,几个群体在第二次随访访谈时使用HAART的可能性仍然显著较低:黑人、男性和女性吸毒者、女性异性恋者;受教育程度较低者、未参保者和由医疗补助计划承保者、东北部居民以及CD4细胞计数≥500个/微升者(所有p<0.05)。使用多因素逻辑回归分析,低CD4细胞计数(CD4<50个/微升:比值比[OR],3.20;p<0.001)在第二次随访访谈时仍然是当前使用HAART的显著预测因素,但未参保(OR,0.71;p<0.05)则预示未接受HAART治疗。
到1998年1月,美国接受HIV治疗的人群中接受过HAART治疗的比例增至受影响人群的70%以上,群体之间在使用方面的差异有所缩小但并未消失。然而,根据美国卫生与公众服务部指南符合HAART治疗条件的人群中,近一半在这些药物首次引入近2年后实际上并未接受治疗。对于无禁忌证且能够耐受的人群,需要采取促进HAART治疗启动和持续的策略。