Cowan M J, Chou S H, Tarantal A F
Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Division, University of California, San Francisco 94143-1278, USA.
Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop. 2001(33):145-71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04469-8_10.
The potential advantage of in utero HSC transplantation over a postnatal BMT is that early curative therapy could be given to an affected fetus, thus eliminating standard intensive immunosuppressive, marrow-ablative conditioning. It is apparent from studies in animals and humans that MHC-mismatched donor HSC of either fetal or adult origin can engraft in fetal recipients if the transplants are done sufficiently early in gestation. However, except for SCID, the percentage of donor pluripotent HSC that engraft is unacceptably low. We had hoped that for diseases such as thalassemia there would be a selective survival advantage for committed donor progenitor cells resulting in a high percentage of donor cell engraftment. At least based upon the experience in human fetuses with alpha- or beta-thalassemia, this has not been the case. Furthermore, for the majority of potential recipients of in utero HSC transplants, the marrow is non-defective, and the small percentage of pluripotent donor HSC that engraft would not be expected to selectively expand post-transplant. Our own results suggest that the non-defective fetal mouse and rhesus monkey are excellent models in which to study both stem cell engraftment, rejection, and tolerance induction. In our studies in non-defective mice with normal hematopoiesis, while the percentage of donor cells that are present is quite low, in only a small number of these animals were we able to induce permanent skin graft tolerance. Thus, while we found microchimerism in approximately 75% of recipients, less than 10% became tolerant. Even when we co-injected a large number of DC precursors, similar to what has been shown to induce tolerance to allogeneic liver, most of the animals failed to become tolerant to donor skin grafts. Interestingly, donor c-kit+ cells can be recruited with cytokines into the peripheral blood in engrafted mice, although these cells do not seem to be sufficient to induce tolerance to donor skin grafts, suggesting that the type (and location) of the engrafted donor cell plays a key role in tolerance induction. Our results in the fetal monkey model parallel those in the mouse, i.e., only a small number of donor cells engraft with limited tolerance induction. Interestingly, we found in our study of DC that GVHD was induced in those murine recipients of both allogeneic marrow and DC. It is likely that there were a sufficient number of mature DC in the preparation to facilitate a donor cytotoxic response towards the host. As a consequence there was also a significant increase in the percentage of donor cells that engrafted in the survivors. Future studies will focus on ways of blocking the graft vs host reaction while still maintaining the graft-promoting role of the donor T cell.
与出生后进行骨髓移植相比,宫内造血干细胞移植的潜在优势在于可以对患病胎儿进行早期治疗,从而避免了标准的强化免疫抑制和骨髓清除预处理。从动物和人类研究中可以明显看出,如果在妊娠早期足够早地进行移植,无论是胎儿来源还是成人来源的主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)不匹配的供体造血干细胞都可以在胎儿受体中植入。然而,除了重症联合免疫缺陷病(SCID)外,植入的供体多能造血干细胞比例低得令人无法接受。我们曾希望对于地中海贫血等疾病,定向供体祖细胞会有选择性的生存优势,从而导致供体细胞高比例植入。至少根据对患有α或β地中海贫血的人类胎儿的经验来看,情况并非如此。此外,对于大多数宫内造血干细胞移植的潜在受体来说,骨髓并无缺陷,预计植入的少量多能供体造血干细胞在移植后不会选择性扩增。我们自己的研究结果表明,无缺陷的胎鼠和恒河猴是研究干细胞植入、排斥和耐受诱导的优秀模型。在我们对造血正常的无缺陷小鼠的研究中,虽然供体细胞的比例相当低,但只有少数动物能够诱导出永久性皮肤移植耐受。因此,虽然我们在大约75%的受体中发现了微嵌合体,但不到10%的受体产生了耐受。即使我们共同注射大量树突状细胞(DC)前体,类似于已证明可诱导对同种异体肝脏耐受的情况,但大多数动物仍未能对供体皮肤移植产生耐受。有趣的是,在植入的小鼠中,供体c-kit+细胞可以通过细胞因子被募集到外周血中,尽管这些细胞似乎不足以诱导对供体皮肤移植的耐受,这表明植入的供体细胞的类型(和位置)在耐受诱导中起关键作用。我们在胎猴模型中的结果与小鼠模型中的结果相似,即只有少量供体细胞植入,耐受诱导有限。有趣的是,我们在对DC的研究中发现,同种异体骨髓和DC的小鼠受体中会诱导移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。很可能制剂中有足够数量的成熟DC来促进供体对宿主的细胞毒性反应。结果,存活者中植入的供体细胞百分比也显著增加。未来的研究将集中在如何阻断移植物抗宿主反应,同时仍保持供体T细胞的促移植作用。