Tregenza T, Pritchard V L, Butlin R K
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of Biology, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1687-98. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00713.x.
There are many proposed routes for the origin of premating reproductive isolation, but few systematic studies aimed at testing their relative importance. Accumulated information about the biogeographical history of the European meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus, has allowed us to make a planned series of comparisons among populations aimed at distinguishing the contributions of some of these hypotheses. We have compared the effects on assortative mating of long-term isolation in glacial refugia, founder events during postglacial colonization, and sympatry with a closely related species. A likelihood-based analysis allowed us to separate effects of variation in male and female mating propensity among populations from variation in mate choice leading to assortative mating. All three effects contributed significantly to the overall variation in mating pattern in a set of 21 pairwise comparisons among seven populations. Male cuticular composition, but not other candidate signals, was significantly associated with the level of assortative mating. Of the hypotheses for the origin of reproductive isolation, only the predictions of the founder hypothesis explained a significant amount of the variation in assortative mating. This does not rule out the possiblity that there may be some other explanation. Having established the pattern of divergence, it is possible to generate hypotheses that explain our results at least as well as the founder hypothesis. However, because many such post hoc hypotheses are possible, they cannot be tested with this dataset. On this basis, our results favor the hypothesis that some aspect of the colonization process tends to accelerate divergence in mating signals leading to premating reproductive isolation. This could be accomplished through any one of several mechanisms. Colonization involves many bottlenecks as new populations are established at the edge of the range by long-distance migrants. Genetic effects may be important, but these bottlenecks may also alter the conditions under which mates are found and chosen, as suggested by Kaneshiro. At the same time, the colonizing populations may encounter novel environmental challenges.
关于交配前生殖隔离的起源,有许多提出的途径,但旨在检验它们相对重要性的系统研究却很少。关于欧洲草地蝗虫Chorthippus parallelus生物地理历史的累积信息,使我们能够针对其中一些假设,在种群之间进行一系列有计划的比较。我们比较了冰川避难所中的长期隔离、冰期后殖民化过程中的奠基者事件以及与近缘物种的同域分布对选型交配的影响。基于似然性的分析使我们能够将种群间雌雄交配倾向的变化影响与导致选型交配的配偶选择变化影响区分开来。在七个种群的21对比较中,所有这三种影响对交配模式的总体变化都有显著贡献。雄性表皮成分而非其他候选信号与选型交配水平显著相关。在生殖隔离起源的假设中,只有奠基者假设的预测解释了选型交配中大量的变化。这并不排除可能存在其他解释的可能性。在确定了分化模式之后,有可能产生至少与奠基者假设一样能解释我们结果的假设。然而,由于可能有许多这样的事后假设,它们无法用这个数据集进行检验。在此基础上,我们的结果支持这样一种假设,即殖民化过程的某些方面倾向于加速交配信号的分化,从而导致交配前生殖隔离。这可以通过几种机制中的任何一种来实现。殖民化涉及许多瓶颈,因为新种群是由远距离迁徙者在分布范围边缘建立的。遗传效应可能很重要,但正如Kaneshiro所指出的,这些瓶颈也可能改变寻找和选择配偶的条件。与此同时,殖民化种群可能会遇到新的环境挑战。