• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿猝死病理调查中特定阶段的有用性分析

An analysis of the usefulness of specific stages in the pathologic investigation of sudden infant death.

作者信息

Mitchell E, Krous H F, Donald T, Byard R W

机构信息

Forensic Science Centre and Department of Pathology, University of Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000 Dec;21(4):395-400. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200012000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00000433-200012000-00020
PMID:11111805
Abstract

Retrospective analysis of autopsy findings in 60 infants who had been found unexpectedly dead in their cribs or beds in South Australia from 1994 to 1998 was undertaken to determine the diagnostic usefulness of individual stages in the postmortem investigation. Positive findings occurred in 2 of 43 scene examinations (3%), 2 of 60 external examinations (3%), 2 of 11 radiologic examinations (18%), 8 of 60 internal examinations (13%), 7 of 60 histologic examinations (12%), and 3 of 58 microbiologic examinations (5%). No positive findings were detected on toxicologic screening. Not every case underwent each diagnostic step. This gave alternative diagnoses to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in 15 cases (25%). This study demonstrates an increase in the percentage of cases of unexpected infant death due to causes other than SIDS; it also shows the diagnostic yield of individual stages in the postmortem evaluation of such cases. Negative findings were important in giving validity to the diagnosis in the 45 cases that were ultimately designated as SIDS.

摘要

对1994年至1998年在南澳大利亚州婴儿床或床上意外死亡的60名婴儿的尸检结果进行回顾性分析,以确定尸检调查各个阶段的诊断效用。43次现场检查中有2次(3%)发现阳性结果,60次外部检查中有2次(3%),11次放射学检查中有2次(18%),60次内部检查中有8次(13%),60次组织学检查中有7次(12%),58次微生物学检查中有3次(5%)。毒理学筛查未发现阳性结果。并非每个病例都进行了每个诊断步骤。这为15例(25%)婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)提供了其他诊断。本研究表明,非SIDS原因导致的意外婴儿死亡病例百分比有所增加;它还显示了此类病例尸检评估中各个阶段的诊断率。阴性结果对于最终被认定为SIDS的45例病例的诊断有效性很重要。

相似文献

1
An analysis of the usefulness of specific stages in the pathologic investigation of sudden infant death.婴儿猝死病理调查中特定阶段的有用性分析
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000 Dec;21(4):395-400. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200012000-00020.
2
American Academy of Pediatrics: Distinguishing sudden infant death syndrome from child abuse fatalities.美国儿科学会:区分婴儿猝死综合征与虐待儿童致死情况。
Pediatrics. 2001 Feb;107(2):437-41.
3
[A proposal of essentials for forensic pathological diagnosis of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)].[关于婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)法医病理诊断要点的建议]
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 2000 Aug;54(2):247-55.
4
Toward a standardized investigation protocol in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy in South Africa: a multicenter study of medico-legal investigation procedures and outcomes.迈向南非婴儿猝死综合征标准化调查方案:一项关于法医学调查程序与结果的多中心研究
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Sep;9(3):344-50. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9427-5. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Evaluation of diagnostic tools applied in the examination of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy and early childhood.用于婴儿期和幼儿期意外猝死检查的诊断工具评估
Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Feb 18;125(2-3):262-8. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00009-9.
6
Toxicologic analysis in cases of possible sudden infant death syndrome: a worthwhile exercise?对疑似婴儿猝死综合征病例进行毒理学分析:一项值得开展的工作?
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002 Jun;23(2):162-6. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200206000-00010.
7
Investigation of sudden infant deaths in the State of Maryland (1990-2000).马里兰州婴儿猝死调查(1990 - 2000年)
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Mar 10;148(2-3):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.01.021.
8
Changing trends in the diagnosis of sudden infant death.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000 Dec;21(4):311-4. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200012000-00002.
9
Fatal child abuse and sudden infant death syndrome: a critical diagnostic decision.致命性虐待儿童与婴儿猝死综合征:一项关键的诊断决策。
Pediatrics. 1993 Feb;91(2):423-9.
10
Guidelines for postmortem protocol for ocular investigation of sudden unexplained infant death and suspected physical child abuse.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2007 Dec;28(4):323-9. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31815b4c00.

引用本文的文献

1
Postmortem diagnostics in sudden unexpected death in infants and children: use and utility.婴幼儿及儿童猝死的尸检诊断:应用与效用
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Mar 5;184(3):223. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06035-6.
2
Does citing early SIDS research skew contemporary conclusions?引用早期婴儿猝死综合征研究是否会歪曲当代结论?
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00848-x.
3
Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Among Siblings of Children Who Died of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Denmark.丹麦死于婴儿猝死综合征儿童的兄弟姐妹患婴儿猝死综合征的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252724. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52724.
4
Seizure-related deaths in children: The expanding spectrum.儿童癫痫相关死亡:不断扩大的范围。
Epilepsia. 2021 Mar;62(3):570-582. doi: 10.1111/epi.16833. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
5
Genetic testing in sudden infant death - a wolf in sheep's clothing?婴儿猝死中的基因检测——披着羊皮的狼?
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Sep;15(3):329-331. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-0047-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
6
Bed sharing deaths in infancy - sids or asphyxia?婴儿期同床睡眠死亡——是婴儿猝死综合征还是窒息?
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(9):1409. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1409.
7
Sudden and unexpected death in early life: proceedings of a symposium in honor of Dr. Henry F. Krous.早年的突然意外死亡:纪念亨利·F·克劳斯博士研讨会会议记录
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Dec;8(4):414-25. doi: 10.1007/s12024-012-9376-4. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
8
Virological investigations in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI).婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)的病毒学调查。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Dec;6(4):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9181-x. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
9
Investigation of unexplained infant deaths in Jerusalem, Israel 1996-2003.1996 - 2003年以色列耶路撒冷不明原因婴儿死亡调查
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Aug;92(8):697-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.107425. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
10
The relation between child death and child maltreatment.儿童死亡与儿童虐待之间的关系。
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Mar;91(3):265-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.066696.