Weber M A, Hartley J C, Ashworth M T, Malone M, Sebire N J
Department of Paediatric Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Dec;6(4):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9181-x. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
Previous studies have implicated viral infections in the pathogenesis of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), and routine virological investigations are recommended by current SUDI autopsy protocols. The aim of this study is to determine the role of post-mortem virology in establishing a cause of death. A retrospective review of 546 SUDI autopsies was carried out as part of a larger series of >1,500 consecutive paediatric autopsies performed over a 10-year period, 1996-2005, in a single specialist centre. Virological tests were performed as part of the post-mortem examination in 490 (90%) of the 546 SUDI autopsies, comprising 4,639 individual virological tests, of which 79% were performed on lung tissue samples. Diagnostic methods included immunofluorescence assays (using a routine respiratory virus panel; 98% of cases), cell culture (61%), rapid culture techniques such as the DEAFF test for CMV (55%), PCR (13%), electron microscopy (10%), and others. Virus was identified in only 18 cases (4%), viz. five cases of enterovirus, four of RSV, three of HSV and CMV, and one each of adenovirus, influenza virus and HIV. In seven of the 18 cases the death was classified as due to viral infection, whilst of the remaining 11 cases, death was due to bacterial infection in five, a non-infective cause in one and unexplained in five. Virus was identified in 33% of deaths due to probable viral infections, but also in 6% of SUDI due to bacterial infections, and in 2% of SUDI due to known non-infective causes and unexplained SUDI. When predominantly using immunofluorescence, virus is identified in only a small proportion of SUDI autopsies, resulting in a contribution to the final cause of death in <2% of SUDI post-mortem examinations. Routine post-mortem virological analysis by means of an immunofluorescence respiratory virus panel appears to be of limited benefit in SUDI for the purposes of determining cause of death. Application of a broader panel using more sensitive detection techniques may reveal more viruses, although their contribution to the final cause of death requires further exploration.
既往研究表明病毒感染与婴儿猝死综合征(SUDI)的发病机制有关,目前的SUDI尸检方案建议进行常规病毒学检查。本研究的目的是确定尸检病毒学在确定死因方面的作用。作为1996年至2005年10年间在一个专科中心进行的一系列超过1500例连续儿科尸检的一部分,对546例SUDI尸检进行了回顾性分析。在546例SUDI尸检中的490例(90%)中进行了病毒学检测作为尸检的一部分,共进行了4639项个体病毒学检测,其中79%是对肺组织样本进行的。诊断方法包括免疫荧光检测(使用常规呼吸道病毒检测板;98%的病例)、细胞培养(61%)、快速培养技术如巨细胞病毒的DEAFF检测(55%)、聚合酶链反应(13%)、电子显微镜检查(10%)及其他。仅在18例(4%)中检测到病毒,即5例肠道病毒、4例呼吸道合胞病毒、3例单纯疱疹病毒和巨细胞病毒,以及各有1例腺病毒、流感病毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒。在这18例中有7例死亡被归类为病毒感染所致,而其余11例中,5例死于细菌感染,1例死于非感染性原因,5例死因不明。在可能由病毒感染导致的死亡中,33%检测到病毒,但在因细菌感染导致的SUDI中也有6%检测到病毒,在因已知非感染性原因和死因不明的SUDI中则有2%检测到病毒。当主要使用免疫荧光检测时,仅在一小部分SUDI尸检中检测到病毒,在不到2%的SUDI尸检中对最终死因有影响。通过免疫荧光呼吸道病毒检测板进行的常规尸检病毒学分析在SUDI中对于确定死因似乎益处有限。应用更广泛的检测板并使用更敏感的检测技术可能会发现更多病毒,尽管它们对最终死因的贡献仍需进一步探索。