• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜜蜂的迷宫导航:学习路径规律性。

Maze navigation by honeybees: learning path regularity.

作者信息

Zhang S, Mizutani A, Srinivasan M V

机构信息

Centre for Visual Science, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.

出版信息

Learn Mem. 2000 Nov-Dec;7(6):363-74. doi: 10.1101/lm.32900.

DOI:10.1101/lm.32900
PMID:11112795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC311340/
Abstract

We investigated the ability of honeybees to learn mazes of four types: constant-turn mazes, in which the appropriate turn is always in the same direction in each decision chamber; zig-zag mazes, in which the appropriate turn is alternately left and right in successive decision chambers; irregular mazes, in which there is no readily apparent pattern to the turns; and variable irregular mazes, in which the bees were trained to learn several irregular mazes simultaneously. The bees were able to learn to navigate all four types of maze. Performance was best in the constant-turn mazes, somewhat poorer in the zig-zag mazes, poorer still in the irregular mazes, and poorest in the variable irregular mazes. These results demonstrate that bees do not navigate such mazes simply by memorizing the entire sequence of appropriate turns. Rather, performance in the various configurations depends on the existence of regularity in the structure of the maze and on the ease with which this regularity is recognized and learned.

摘要

我们研究了蜜蜂学习四种类型迷宫的能力

恒定转向迷宫,即在每个决策室中正确的转向始终是同一个方向;之字形迷宫,即在连续的决策室中正确的转向交替为左和右;不规则迷宫,即转向没有明显的模式;以及可变不规则迷宫,即训练蜜蜂同时学习几种不规则迷宫。蜜蜂能够学会在所有四种类型的迷宫中导航。在恒定转向迷宫中的表现最佳,在之字形迷宫中稍差,在不规则迷宫中更差,而在可变不规则迷宫中最差。这些结果表明,蜜蜂并非仅仅通过记住整个正确转向序列来在这类迷宫中导航。相反,在各种布局中的表现取决于迷宫结构中规则性的存在,以及这种规则性被识别和学习的难易程度。

相似文献

1
Maze navigation by honeybees: learning path regularity.蜜蜂的迷宫导航:学习路径规律性。
Learn Mem. 2000 Nov-Dec;7(6):363-74. doi: 10.1101/lm.32900.
2
Maze learning by honeybees.蜜蜂的迷宫学习。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1996 Nov;66(3):267-82. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0069.
3
Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli.蜜蜂的记忆:通过视觉刺激的关联分组和回忆进行导航。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1999 Nov;72(3):180-201. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1998.3901.
4
Mental maze solving.解决心理迷宫
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):813-27. doi: 10.1162/089892900562426.
5
Exploration of virtual mazes by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).恒河猴(猕猴)对虚拟迷宫的探索。
Anim Cogn. 2003 Sep;6(3):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0173-z. Epub 2003 May 16.
6
The effects of aging and dopaminergic inhibition on large scale maze learning in rhesus monkeys.衰老和多巴胺抑制对恒河猴大规模迷津学习的影响。
Brain Res Bull. 2021 Oct;175:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Acquisition of navigation by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in an automated fingermaze task.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在自动化指迷任务中获取导航能力。
Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):179-92. doi: 10.1007/s100710100101. Epub 2001 Sep 19.
8
Circadian timed episodic-like memory - a bee knows what to do when, and also where.昼夜节律性情景样记忆——蜜蜂知道何时何地该做何事。
J Exp Biol. 2007 Oct;210(Pt 20):3559-67. doi: 10.1242/jeb.005488.
9
Honeybees Learn Landscape Features during Exploratory Orientation Flights.蜜蜂在探索性定向飞行中学习景观特征。
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 24;26(20):2800-2804. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Seeing near and seeing far; behavioural evidence for dual mechanisms of pattern vision in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).看近与看远:蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)模式视觉双机制的行为证据。
J Exp Biol. 2012 Feb 1;215(Pt 3):397-404. doi: 10.1242/jeb.060954.

引用本文的文献

1
Visuo-motor lateralization in Apis mellifera: flight speed differences in foraging choices.在蜜蜂中视动偏侧性:觅食选择中的飞行速度差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-51141-w.
2
What Behavioral Abilities Emerged at Key Milestones in Human Brain Evolution? 13 Hypotheses on the 600-Million-Year Phylogenetic History of Human Intelligence.人类大脑进化关键节点出现了哪些行为能力?关于人类智力6亿年系统发育史的13种假说。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:685853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685853. eCollection 2021.
3
Wild non-eusocial bees learn a colour discrimination task in response to simulated predation events.野生非社会性蜜蜂通过模拟捕食事件学会了颜色辨别任务。
Naturwissenschaften. 2021 Jun 21;108(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s00114-021-01739-9.
4
Einstein, von Frisch and the honeybee: a historical letter comes to light.爱因斯坦、冯·弗里希与蜜蜂:一封历史信件公诸于世。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021 Jul;207(4):449-456. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01490-6. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Ants resort to heuristics when facing relational-learning tasks they cannot solve.蚂蚁在面对无法解决的关系学习任务时会采用启发式方法。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 12;287(1932):20201262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1262.
6
Maze learning and memory in a decapod crustacean.在十足目甲壳动物中进行迷津学习和记忆。
Biol Lett. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):20190407. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0407. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Honeybees show a context-dependent rightward bias.蜜蜂表现出依赖情境的向右偏好。
Biol Lett. 2019 Feb 28;15(2):20180877. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0877.
8
Numerical cognition in honeybees enables addition and subtraction.蜜蜂的数字认知能力可以进行加法和减法运算。
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 6;5(2):eaav0961. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav0961. eCollection 2019 Feb.
9
Intelligence-Augmented Rat Cyborgs in Maze Solving.智能增强的大鼠半机械人解决迷宫问题
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0147754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147754. eCollection 2016.
10
The Bee as a Model to Investigate Brain and Behavioural Asymmetries.以蜜蜂为模型研究大脑与行为的不对称性
Insects. 2014 Jan 2;5(1):120-38. doi: 10.3390/insects5010120.

本文引用的文献

1
A KINESTHETICALLY CONTROLLED MAZE HABIT IN THE RAT.大鼠的一种动觉控制迷宫习惯
Science. 1940 Mar 15;91(2359):267-9. doi: 10.1126/science.91.2359.267.
2
Maze learning by honeybees.蜜蜂的迷宫学习。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1996 Nov;66(3):267-82. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0069.
3
Spatial memory.空间记忆
Sci Am. 1977 Jun;236(6):82-4, 89-94, 96, 98. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0677-82.