• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks.

作者信息

MacGregor J T, Casciano D, Müller L

机构信息

FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2000 Nov 20;455(1-2):3-20. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00116-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00116-0
PMID:11113464
Abstract

The evolution of testing strategies and methods for identification of mutagenic agents is discussed, beginning with the concern over potential health and population effects of chemical mutagens in the late 1940s that led to the development of regulatory guidelines for mutagenicity testing in the 1970s and 1980s. Efforts to achieve international harmonization of mutagenicity testing guidelines are summarized, and current issues and needs in the field are discussed, including the need for quantitative methods of mutagenic risk assessment, dose-response thresholds, indirect mechanisms of mutagenicity, and the predictivity of mutagenicity assays for carcinogenicity in vivo. Speculation is offered about the future of mutagenicity testing, including possible near-term changes in standard test batteries and the longer-term roles of expression profiling of damage-response genes, in vivo mutagenicity testing methods, and models that better account for differences in metabolism between humans and laboratory model systems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks.
Mutat Res. 2000 Nov 20;455(1-2):3-20. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00116-0.
2
An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.癌症危害识别的综合测试策略。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Aug;46(7):615-39. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2016.1171294. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.用于定义诱变致癌物的短期试验。
IARC Sci Publ. 1999(146):499-536.
4
Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.食品、消费品及环境中化学物质致癌性评估指南。食品、消费品及环境中化学物质致癌性委员会。
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1991;42:1-80.
5
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Current status of the Gene-Tox Program.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;340D:273-81.
7
A feasibility study: Can information collected to classify for mutagenicity be informative in predicting carcinogenicity?一项可行性研究:收集用于分类致突变性的信息能否为预测致癌性提供参考?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;72(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Epidemiology of occupational carcinogens and mutagens.职业致癌物和诱变剂的流行病学
Occup Med. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):487-512.
9
The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.采用简化且国际统一的方法来检测潜在人类致癌物和诱变剂的前景。
Mutagenesis. 1986 Jan;1(1):3-16. doi: 10.1093/mutage/1.1.3.
10
The parallelogram approach in studies of genotoxic effects.遗传毒性效应研究中的平行四边形方法。
Mutat Res. 1994 Oct-Dec;313(2-3):101-15. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(94)90042-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.基于作用模式的遗传毒性致癌物风险评估。
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jun;94(6):1787-1877. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02733-2. Epub 2020 Jun 15.