Fitch W L, Ortega R J
Office of Forensic Services, Maryland Mental Hygiene Administration, Jessup 20794, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2000;18(5):663-78. doi: 10.1002/1099-0798(200010)18:5<663::aid-bsl408>3.0.co;2-v.
Civil commitment in the United States historically has followed a medical, targeting individuals with serious mental disorders and providing for their treatment in the least restrictive setting. In the last decade, however, commitment laws have appeared in some states permitting the hospitalization of personality-disordered criminal offenders at the end of a penal sentence. The American Psychiatric Association has fiercely opposed these laws. The U.S. Supreme Court has given its qualified approval, although legal challenges persist. These laws, together with British proposals to permit the civil commitment of dangerous personality-disordered individuals, should be resisted by all professional disciplines.
在美国,民事收容在历史上一直遵循医学模式,针对患有严重精神障碍的个体,并在限制最少的环境中为他们提供治疗。然而,在过去十年中,一些州出现了收容法律,允许在刑事判决结束时将患有人格障碍的罪犯住院治疗。美国精神病学协会强烈反对这些法律。美国最高法院已给予有条件的批准,尽管法律挑战仍然存在。所有专业学科都应抵制这些法律,以及英国允许对患有危险人格障碍的个体进行民事收容的提议。