• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估持续静脉-静脉血液透析中溶质清除情况的部分透析液收集方法。

A fractional dialysate collection method to estimate solute removal in continuous venovenous hemodialysis.

作者信息

Kanagasundaram N S, Larive A B, Paganini E P

机构信息

Section of Dialysis and Extracorporeal Therapy and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2000 Dec;58(6):2579-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00444.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00444.x
PMID:11115094
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fractional direct dialysis quantification (fDDQ), whereby a known proportion of dialysate effluent is sampled, can reliably estimate total solute removal in intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Our study aimed to develop and test the technique in continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

METHODS

Twenty dialysate collections (mean duration 23.5 hours, range 17.25 to 26.6) were performed in 12 patients on CVVHD. An infusion pump diverted 10% of the total effluent volume to the fractional collection (fc), the remainder being channeled into the bulk collection (bc). Both fc and bc were collected on ice and assayed for urea nitrogen (UN) and creatinine (Cr). Actual solute removal (ASR) was calculated from the measured effluent volume and solute concentrations of the fc and bc. Estimated solute removal (ESR) was calculated from the product of the fc solute concentration and effluent volume. All fc/bc samples in 15 out of 20 collections underwent gram stain and aerobic/anaerobic culture.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analyses suggested good agreement between ASR and ESR [absolute values of percentage differences: 95% CI = 1.73, 5.17% (UN); 1.88, 4.31% (Cr)]. Favorable concordance correlation coefficients confirmed this [rc = 0.995 (UN), 0.997 (Cr)] and were apparently unaffected by heavy pseudomonal growths in 4 out of 7 culture positive collections [rc = 0.997 (UN), 0.997 (Cr); culture negative (N = 8), rc = 0.996 (UN), 0.997 Cr)].

CONCLUSION

fDDQ, using 24-hour, pump-assisted, cooled fractional dialysate sampling reliably estimates total solute removal and provides a practical alternative to total dialysate collection in assessing delivered dialysis dose.

摘要

背景

分数直接透析定量法(fDDQ),即对已知比例的透析液流出物进行采样,能够可靠地估计间歇性血液透析(IHD)中溶质的总清除量。我们的研究旨在开发并在持续性静脉-静脉血液透析(CVVHD)中测试该技术。

方法

对12例接受CVVHD治疗的患者进行了20次透析液收集(平均时长23.5小时,范围17.25至26.6小时)。一台输液泵将总流出液体积的10%转移至分数收集器(fc),其余部分则导入总体收集器(bc)。fc和bc均在冰上收集,并检测尿素氮(UN)和肌酐(Cr)。根据测得的流出液体积以及fc和bc的溶质浓度计算实际溶质清除量(ASR)。根据fc溶质浓度与流出液体积的乘积计算估计溶质清除量(ESR)。20次收集中有15次的所有fc/bc样本均进行了革兰氏染色及需氧/厌氧培养。

结果

Bland-Altman分析表明ASR与ESR之间具有良好的一致性[百分比差异的绝对值:95%置信区间 = 1.73, 5.17%(UN);1.88, 4.31%(Cr)]。良好的一致性相关系数证实了这一点[rc = 0.995(UN),0.997(Cr)],并且显然不受7次培养阳性收集样本中4次出现的大量假单胞菌生长的影响[rc = 0.997(UN),0.997(Cr);培养阴性(N = 8),rc = 0.996(UN),0.997 Cr]。

结论

使用24小时泵辅助冷却分数透析液采样的fDDQ能够可靠地估计溶质的总清除量,并为评估透析剂量时的总体透析液收集提供了一种实用的替代方法。

相似文献

1
A fractional dialysate collection method to estimate solute removal in continuous venovenous hemodialysis.一种用于评估持续静脉-静脉血液透析中溶质清除情况的部分透析液收集方法。
Kidney Int. 2000 Dec;58(6):2579-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00444.x.
2
Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group.直接通过尿素清除率测量血液透析剂量时的不精确性。血液透析研究组。
Kidney Int. 1999 Feb;55(2):635-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00269.x.
3
Dialyzer fiber bundle volume and kinetics of solute removal in continuous venovenous hemodialysis.连续性静脉-静脉血液透析中透析器纤维束体积与溶质清除动力学
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 May;39(5):1047-53. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32788.
4
[The effects of dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rate on solute clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy].[透析液和超滤流速对连续性肾脏替代治疗期间溶质清除率的影响]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Mar;40(3):183-6.
5
Direct dialysis quantification: investigation of the impact of dialysate preservation techniques on solute assays.直接透析定量法:透析液保存技术对溶质分析影响的研究
Blood Purif. 2004;22(5):435-9. doi: 10.1159/000080727. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
6
Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model.用数学模型量化血液透析处方变化对有效溶质清除的影响。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Mar;10(3):601-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V103601.
7
Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance.血液透析的血流量可根据在线透析液尿素测量值以及有效透析器尿素清除率准确估算。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;1(5):960-4. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00810306. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
8
Protein-bound solute removal during extended multipass versus standard hemodialysis.延长多次透析与标准血液透析过程中蛋白结合溶质的清除
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Apr 18;16:57. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0056-y.
9
Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement.通过对用过的透析液进行连续采样和测量透析液总体积来精确量化透析。
Kidney Int. 1997 Aug;52(2):530-7. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.364.
10
Effects of dialysate flow configurations in continuous renal replacement therapy on solute removal: computational modeling.连续肾脏替代治疗中透析液流动方式对溶质清除的影响:计算模型。
Blood Purif. 2013;35(1-3):106-11. doi: 10.1159/000346093. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A new technique for low-volume continuous sampling of spent dialysate: a validation study.一种用于低容量持续采集透析废液的新技术:一项验证研究。
J Artif Organs. 2019 Jun;22(2):134-140. doi: 10.1007/s10047-019-01091-w. Epub 2019 Feb 8.