• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎:一项针对老年人的前瞻性对比研究

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly.

作者信息

Tuech J J, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J P

机构信息

Dept of Digestive Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2000 Nov;14(11):1031-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640000267.

DOI:10.1007/s004640000267
PMID:11116412
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic and open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in patients aged >/=75 years.

METHODS

From January 1993 to December 1998, all patients 75 years of age and older undergoing an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis were included in the study. The patients were divided into the following two groups: group 1 (n = 22) consisted of patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure; group 2 (n = 24) consisted of patients who underwent an open procedure.

RESULTS

In group 1, there were 12 women and 10 men with a mean age of 77.2 years (range, 75-82); in group 2, there were 14 women and 10 men with a mean age of 78 years (range, 76-84) (p = 0.37). There was no difference between the groups in ASA classification. The operative time was shorter in group 2 (136 vs 234 mins). The postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required (5.4 vs 8.2 days, p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (18% vs 50%, p = 0.02), postoperative length of hospital stay (13.1 vs 20.2 days, p = 0.003), and the inpatient rehabilitation (6 vs 15 patients, p = 0.01) were significantly shorter for group 1 than for group 2. There were no perioperative deaths. The conversion rate was 9% in group 1.

CONCLUSION

The data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely to older patients with fewer complication, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and a more rapid return to preoperative activity levels than that seen with open colorectal resection.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性对照研究的目的是评估年龄≥75岁的乙状结肠憩室炎患者行腹腔镜结肠切除术和开放结肠切除术的结果。

方法

1993年1月至1998年12月,所有75岁及以上因乙状结肠憩室炎接受择期结肠切除术的患者均纳入本研究。患者分为以下两组:第1组(n = 22)为接受腹腔镜手术的患者;第2组(n = 24)为接受开放手术的患者。

结果

第1组有12名女性和10名男性,平均年龄77.2岁(范围75 - 82岁);第2组有14名女性和10名男性,平均年龄78岁(范围76 - 84岁)(p = 0.37)。两组在ASA分级方面无差异。第2组手术时间较短(136分钟对234分钟)。第1组需要胃肠外镇痛药的术后时间(5.4天对8.2天,p = 0.001)、术后发病率(18%对50%,p = 0.02)、术后住院时间(13.1天对20.2天,p = 0.003)以及住院康复情况(6名对15名患者,p = 0.01)均显著短于第2组。无围手术期死亡病例。第1组的中转率为9%。

结论

本研究数据表明,乙状结肠憩室炎的腹腔镜结肠切除术可安全应用于老年患者,与开放结直肠切除术相比,并发症更少、疼痛减轻、住院时间缩短且能更快恢复到术前活动水平。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly.腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎:一项针对老年人的前瞻性对比研究
Surg Endosc. 2000 Nov;14(11):1031-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640000267.
2
Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.肥胖和非肥胖患者乙状结肠憩室炎的腹腔镜结肠切除术:一项前瞻性比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Dec;15(12):1427-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9023-8.
3
Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎:一项针对老年人的前瞻性研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Jul-Aug;48(40):1045-7.
4
[Impact of obesity on postoperative results of elective laparoscopic colectomy in sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study].[肥胖对乙状结肠憩室炎择期腹腔镜结肠切除术术后结果的影响:一项前瞻性研究]
Ann Chir. 2001 Dec;126(10):996-1000. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00638-1.
5
Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.明确腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠切除术在憩室炎治疗中的作用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1726-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02236858.
6
Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease.与非憩室疾病相比,腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室炎并不会增加发病率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Mar;20(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0649-6. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
7
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis is safe: review of 576 consecutive colectomies.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎是安全的:对576例连续结肠切除术的回顾
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1629-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4393-5. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.腹腔镜与开放乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的成本结构:异同
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Apr;45(4):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6225-x.
9
Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复发性和复杂性憩室炎:396例患者的前瞻性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Apr;389(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
10
Are there differences in outcome after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease and for cancer? A national inpatient study.憩室病和癌症行择期乙状结肠切除术后的结局是否存在差异?一项全国性住院患者研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;19(3):260-265. doi: 10.1111/codi.13461.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助选择性乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00079. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Laparoscopic Hartmann Procedure-A Surgery That Still Saves Lives.
腹腔镜Hartmann手术——一种仍能挽救生命的手术。
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;13(4):914. doi: 10.3390/life13040914.
4
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
5
Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.憩室炎手术后的死亡率和并发症:系统评价与荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Oct;4(5):706-713. doi: 10.1177/2050640615617357. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.老年患者结直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术的系统评价
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jul 15;8(7):573-82. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i7.573.
7
Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery beneficial for elderly patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜结直肠手术对老年患者有益吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):756-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2748-9. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
8
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术降低老年人死亡率:对66483例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):322-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3672-x. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
9
Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients.老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术与开放手术随机研究的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):466-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3223-x.
10
Acute and elective laparoscopic resection for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis: clinical and histological outcome.急性和择期腹腔镜切除术治疗复杂乙状结肠憩室炎:临床和组织学结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Nov;17(11):1966-71. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2296-0. Epub 2013 Aug 6.