Suppr超能文献

重新评估双相情感障碍广泛临床谱中的患病率及诊断构成。

Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders.

作者信息

Akiskal H S, Bourgeois M L, Angst J, Post R, Möller H, Hirschfeld R

机构信息

International Mood Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2000 Sep;59 Suppl 1:S5-S30. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00203-2.

Abstract

Until recently it was believed that no more than 1% of the general population has bipolar disorder. Emerging transatlantic data are beginning to provide converging evidence for a higher prevalence of up to at least 5%. Manic states, even those with mood-incongruent features, as well as mixed (dysphoric) mania, are now formally included in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Mixed states occur in an average of 40% of bipolar patients over a lifetime; current evidence supports a broader definition of mixed states consisting of full-blown mania with two or more concomitant depressive symptoms. The largest increase in prevalence rates, however, is accounted for by 'softer' clinical expressions of bipolarity situated between the extremes of full-blown bipolar disorder where the person has at least one manic episode (bipolar I) and strictly defined unipolar major depressive disorder without personal or family history for excited periods. Bipolar II is the prototype for these intermediary conditions with major depressions and history of spontaneous hypomanic episodes; current evidence indicates that most hypomanias pursue a recurrent course and that their usual duration is 1-3 days, falling below the arbitrary 4-day cutoff required in DSM-IV. Depressions with antidepressant-associated hypomania (sometimes referred to as bipolar III) also appear, on the basis of extensive international research neglected by both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, to belong to the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. Broadly defined, the bipolar spectrum in studies conducted during the last decade accounts for 30-55% of all major depressions. Rapid-cycling, defined as alternation of depressive and excited (at least four per year), more often arise from a bipolar II than a bipolar I baseline; such cycling does not in the main appear to be a distinct clinical subtype - but rather a transient complication in 20% in the long-term course of bipolar disorder. Major depressions superimposed on cyclothymic oscillations represent a more severe variant of bipolar II, often mistaken for borderline or other personality disorders in the dramatic cluster. Moreover, atypical depressive features with reversed vegetative signs, anxiety states, as well as alcohol and substance abuse comorbidity, is common in these and other bipolar patients. The proper recognition of the entire clinical spectrum of bipolarity behind such 'masks' has important implications for psychiatric research and practice. Conditions which require further investigation include: (1) major depressive episodes where hyperthymic traits - lifelong hypomanic features without discrete hypomanic episodes - dominate the intermorbid or premorbid phases; and (2) depressive mixed states consisting of few hypomanic symptoms (i.e., racing thoughts, sexual arousal) during full-blown major depressive episodes - included in Kraepelin's schema of mixed states, but excluded by DSM-IV. These do not exhaust all potential diagnostic entities for possible inclusion in the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: the present review did not consider cyclic, seasonal, irritable-dysphoric or otherwise impulse-ridden, intermittently explosive or agitated psychiatric conditions for which the bipolar connection is less established. The concept of bipolar spectrum as used herein denotes overlapping clinical expressions, without necessarily implying underlying genetic homogeneity. In the course of the illness of the same patient, one often observes the varied manifestations described above - whether they be formal diagnostic categories or those which have remained outside the official nosology. Some form of life charting of illness with colored graphic representation of episodes, stressors, and treatments received can be used to document the uniquely varied course characteristic of each patient, thereby greatly enhancing clinical evaluation.

摘要

直到最近,人们一直认为普通人群中患双相情感障碍的比例不超过1%。新出现的跨大西洋数据开始提供越来越多的证据,表明患病率更高,至少可达5%。躁狂状态,甚至那些具有心境不协调特征的状态,以及混合(烦躁)躁狂,现在在ICD - 10和DSM - IV中都被正式纳入。混合状态在双相情感障碍患者一生中平均出现的比例为40%;目前的证据支持对混合状态进行更广泛的定义,即由伴有两种或更多伴随抑郁症状的全面躁狂组成。然而,患病率上升幅度最大的是双相情感障碍的“较轻”临床表型,这些表型介于全面双相情感障碍(患者至少有一次躁狂发作,即双相I型)和严格定义的无个人或家族兴奋期病史的单相重度抑郁症之间。双相II型是这些中间状态的原型,伴有重度抑郁症和自发轻躁狂发作史;目前的证据表明,大多数轻躁狂发作呈复发病程,其通常持续时间为1 - 3天,低于DSM - IV规定的任意4天的界限。基于ICD - 10和DSM - IV都忽略的广泛国际研究,与抗抑郁药相关的轻躁狂的抑郁症(有时称为双相III型)似乎也属于双相情感障碍的临床谱系。广义地说,在过去十年进行的研究中,双相谱系占所有重度抑郁症的30 - 55%。快速循环被定义为抑郁和兴奋交替(每年至少四次),更多地源于双相II型而非双相I型基线;这种循环在双相情感障碍的长期病程中主要似乎不是一种独特的临床亚型,而是20%患者的一种短暂并发症。叠加在环性心境障碍振荡上的重度抑郁症代表双相II型的一种更严重变体,在戏剧性集群中常被误诊为边缘型或其他人格障碍。此外,具有反向植物神经体征的非典型抑郁特征、焦虑状态以及酒精和物质滥用共病在这些及其他双相情感障碍患者中很常见。正确认识这些“面具”背后双相情感障碍的整个临床谱系对精神科研究和实践具有重要意义。需要进一步研究的情况包括:(1)重度抑郁发作,其中情感高涨特质(终身轻躁狂特征但无离散轻躁狂发作)在疾病间期或病前阶段占主导;(2)在全面重度抑郁发作期间由少数轻躁狂症状(即思维奔逸、性唤起)组成的抑郁混合状态——包括在克雷佩林的混合状态模式中,但被DSM - IV排除。这些并未穷尽所有可能纳入双相情感障碍临床谱系的潜在诊断实体:本综述未考虑周期性、季节性、易激惹 - 烦躁或其他冲动驱使、间歇性爆发或激动的精神状况,其与双相情感障碍的关联尚不明确。本文中使用的双相谱系概念表示重叠的临床表型,不一定意味着潜在的基因同质性。在同一患者的病程中,人们经常观察到上述各种表现——无论是正式的诊断类别还是那些未被官方疾病分类学涵盖的表现。某种形式的用彩色图形表示发作、应激源和所接受治疗的疾病生活图表可用于记录每个患者独特的多样病程特征,从而极大地增强临床评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验