Sadr Seyed Saeed, Samimi-Ardestani Seyed Mehdi, Semnani Yousef, Adel Narges, Tajari Faezeh, Samani Nastaran
Department of Psychiatry Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Behavioral Science Research Center of Imam Hossein Hospital Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 12;8(1):e70341. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70341. eCollection 2025 Jan.
This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.
This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups ( = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).
The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences ((4.120) = 10.36, < 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age ((1.123) = 3.92, = 0.052) and gender ((1.123) = 0.1, = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.
The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.
本研究旨在比较1型双相情感障碍(BD)、双相谱系(BS)患者及其未患病的一级亲属的神经软体征(NSSs)。
这项描述性横断面研究纳入了转诊至伊玛目侯赛因医院精神科的参与者。五组(每组n = 25):1型BD患者、BS患者、两组未患病的一级亲属以及一个对照组,使用神经评估量表(NES)进行评估。
分析显示,双相I型障碍患者的NES评分最高,组间差异显著(F(4.120) = 10.36,p < 0.001)。Bonferroni校正确定双相I型患者是这种差异的主要来源,而其他组之间没有显著差异。协方差分析表明,年龄(F(1.123) = 3.92,p = 0.052)和性别(F(1.123) = 0.1,p = 0.75)对NES评分没有显著影响。然而,除感觉亚集外,所有四个NES亚集均对总分有显著贡献。双相I型患者与大多数其他组之间存在显著差异,但与BS组无显著差异,BS组与其他组无显著差异。未发现与年龄、性别或发病年龄存在相关性。
与BS组和对照组相比,I型BD中NSS严重程度更高,这突出了其与I型BD中遗传和神经发育差异的潜在联系。建议进一步研究。