Preik M, Lauer T, Heiss C, Tabery S, Strauer B E, Kelm M
Medizinische Klinik B, Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Ultraschall Med. 2000 Oct;21(5):195-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7989.
Brachial artery ultrasonography is used to measure flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) as a marker of endothelial function in patients at risk for atherosclerosis. Major disadvantages are the time-consuming manual readings and the high within- and between-observer variability. The authors hypothesize that the ultrasound-based determination of endothelial function can be simplified and refined by an automated analysis system.
FMD was quantified by a 7.5 MHz linear transducer following 5 minutes of ischemia of the proximal forearm in 8 healthy volunteers on two occasions. Brachial artery diameter was comparatively assessed 1. manually from the video signal and 2. by a PC-based analyzing system. For the manual readings the mean differences for the FMD were 2.5 +/- 2.3% between-reader, 2.0 +/- 0.9% within-reader and 2.1 +/- 1.5% for scans on different days in contrast to 0.8 +/- 0.4 (between-reader), 0.8 +/- 0.6 (within-reader) and 1.3 +/- 0.9% (day-to-day) for the computerized system. The coefficient of variability for the measurement of arterial diameter was 1.34% for manual readings and 0.78% for the automated analysis system. The mean time for manual readings from S-VHS tapes was 35 minutes in contrast to 9 minutes for the PC-based analysis system.
The new automated analysis system for the boundary detection of the vascular wall reduces the variability and greatly increases the speed of the measurements to determine endothelial function. In future, these advantages will help to screen larger numbers of individuals for endothelial dysfunction, particularly for follow-up and intervention trials, and to reduce the variability between different laboratories.
肱动脉超声检查用于测量血流介导的血管舒张(FMD),作为动脉粥样硬化风险患者内皮功能的标志物。主要缺点是人工读数耗时,且观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性较高。作者推测,基于超声的内皮功能测定可通过自动化分析系统简化和优化。
8名健康志愿者分两次在前臂近端缺血5分钟后,使用7.5MHz线性换能器对FMD进行定量。肱动脉直径通过以下两种方式进行比较评估:1. 从视频信号中手动评估;2. 通过基于计算机的分析系统评估。对于人工读数,不同读者之间FMD的平均差异为2.5±2.3%,同一读者内部为2.0±0.9%,不同日期扫描的差异为2.1±1.5%;相比之下,计算机系统的相应数据分别为0.8±0.4(不同读者之间)、0.8±0.6(同一读者内部)和1.3±0.9%(不同日期之间)。人工读数测量动脉直径的变异系数为1.34%,自动化分析系统为0.78%。从S-VHS录像带进行人工读数的平均时间为35分钟,而基于计算机的分析系统为9分钟。
用于血管壁边界检测的新型自动化分析系统降低了变异性,大大提高了测定内皮功能的速度。未来,这些优势将有助于对更多个体进行内皮功能障碍筛查,特别是用于随访和干预试验,并减少不同实验室之间的变异性。