• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Semi-automated direct epifluorescent filter technique for total bacterial count in raw milk.

作者信息

Hermida M, Taboada M, Menéndez S, Rodríguez-Otero J L

机构信息

Laboratorio de Mouriscade, Deputación Provincial de Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2000 Nov-Dec;83(6):1345-8.

PMID:11128136
Abstract

The Direct Epifluorescent Filter Technique (DEFT) and the reference method of counting total bacterial colonies on Petri dishes were compared. IDF Standards 128 (1985) and 161A (1995) were applied. A total of 496 samples of milk were analyzed. Colony forming units per microL milk were transformed to decimal logarithmic units: log (cfu/microL). The repeatability standard deviation, Sr = 0.114, was typical for a routine microbiological method. To study the carryover at different levels of bacteria, 3 tests were performed on milk samples of approximately 100, 700, and >1000 cfu/microL. For the first 2 experiments, no carryover was detected; in the milk sample with >1000 cfu/microL, the carryover was <0.12%. When the DEFT counts were regressed versus the reference method, the values of the slope and intercept were 0.92 and 0.17, respectively; the correlation coefficient was r = 0.84; and the residual standard deviation was Syx = 0.287. The paired t-test showed that the reference method and DEFT do not give significantly different results (p = 0.05).

摘要

相似文献

1
Semi-automated direct epifluorescent filter technique for total bacterial count in raw milk.
J AOAC Int. 2000 Nov-Dec;83(6):1345-8.
2
The direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT): increased selectivity, sensitivity and rapidity.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1985 Dec;59(6):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb03351.x.
3
Collaborative trial of the direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT), a rapid method for counting bacteria in milk.直接荧光过滤技术(DEFT)用于牛奶细菌计数的快速方法的协作试验。
J Appl Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;54(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb02604.x.
4
Do different standard plate counting (IDF/ISSO or AOAC) methods interfere in the conversion of individual bacteria counts to colony forming units in raw milk?不同的标准平板计数法(国际乳品联合会/国际标准化组织或美国分析化学家协会)是否会干扰生乳中单个细菌计数向菌落形成单位的转换?
J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Oct;121(4):1052-8. doi: 10.1111/jam.13227. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Determination of Viable Bacterial Populations in Raw Milk within 20 Minutes by Using a Direct Epifluorescent Filter Technique.
J Food Prot. 1997 Jul;60(7):874-876. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-60.7.874.
6
[Bioluminescent assay of total bacterial contamination of raw milk].[生乳中细菌总污染的生物发光测定法]
Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 1999 May-Jun;35(3):358-65.
7
The direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT).
Methods Mol Biol. 1995;46:113-21. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-297-3:113.
8
Use of microfiltration to improve fluid milk quality.使用微滤改善液态奶品质。
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Mar;89 Suppl 1:E20-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72361-X.
9
The use of direct epifluorescent microscopy (DEM) and the direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT) to assess microbial populations on food contact surfaces.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1988 Sep;65(3):215-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01888.x.
10
Influence of fluorescence of bacteria stained with acridine orange on the enumeration of microorganisms in raw milk.吖啶橙染色细菌的荧光对原料乳中微生物计数的影响
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Dec;83(12):2753-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75170-8.