Suppr超能文献

[两种儿科布洛芬制剂的解热安全性及准确性评估]

[Evaluation of the antipyretic safety and accuracy of two pediatric ibuprofen formulations].

作者信息

Díez Domingo J, Planelles Cantarino M V, Moreno Madrid F, Uberos Fernández J, Moreno Martín J, Molina Carballo A, Antelo Cortizas J, Armenteros González S, Domínguez Granados R, Moreno Carretero E

机构信息

Centro de Salud de Nazaret. Valencia.

出版信息

An Esp Pediatr. 2000 Nov;53(5):436-40.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy and to evaluate the clinical bioequivalence of two different formulations of ibuprofen (suspension and effervescent granules) in febrile children.

METHODS

An open, randomized, multicenter study. Febrile children (axillary temperature 38 degrees C) weighing more than 25 kg, admitted into the emergency departments of the participating hospitals were randomly assigned to either of the two treatment groups: ibuprofen suspension (7 mg/kg) or effervescent granules at the following dosages: 200 mg in children weighing 2540 kg or 400mg in children weighing 3540 kg and with an axillary temperature above 39 degrees C. This latter dose of 400 mg was also given to children weighing more than 40 kg.The investigators took axillary temperature before treatment and 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min after administration of the corresponding dose. Possible adverse events were noted.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included in the study; 51 received the effervescent granules and 52 received the suspension formulation. The mean temperature was reduced in both groups during the study (p < 0.005). No differences were found between the formulations. The mean differences of temperatures at each point of the study were within the clinical bioequivalence interval (+/-0.5 degrees C). Only one patient had an axillary temperature of 35.9 degrees C. This was the only adverse event recorded in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ibuprofen formulations were effective in reducing fever and may be considered clinically bioequivalent.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同剂型布洛芬(混悬液和泡腾颗粒)在发热儿童中的疗效,并评估其临床生物等效性。

方法

一项开放、随机、多中心研究。将入住参与研究医院急诊科、体重超过25kg且腋下温度≥38℃的发热儿童随机分为两个治疗组:布洛芬混悬液(7mg/kg)或泡腾颗粒,后者给药剂量如下:体重25-40kg的儿童服用200mg,体重35-40kg且腋下温度高于39℃的儿童或体重超过40kg的儿童服用400mg。研究人员在治疗前及给予相应剂量药物后30、60、90、120、180和240分钟测量腋下温度,记录可能出现的不良事件。

结果

共有103例患者纳入研究;51例接受泡腾颗粒治疗,52例接受混悬液剂型治疗。研究期间两组的平均体温均有所下降(p<0.005)。两种剂型之间未发现差异。研究各时间点的体温平均差值均在临床生物等效区间(±0.5℃)内。仅1例患者腋下温度为35.9℃。这是该研究记录的唯一不良事件。

结论

两种布洛芬剂型在降低发热方面均有效,可认为具有临床生物等效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验