• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公园在保护热带生物多样性方面的有效性。

Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.

作者信息

Bruner A G, Gullison R E, Rice R E, da Fonseca G A

机构信息

Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation International, 2501 M Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20037, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):125-8. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.125.

DOI:10.1126/science.291.5501.125
PMID:11141563
Abstract

We assessed the impacts of anthropogenic threats on 93 protected areas in 22 tropical countries to test the hypothesis that parks are an effective means to protect tropical biodiversity. We found that the majority of parks are successful at stopping land clearing, and to a lesser degree effective at mitigating logging, hunting, fire, and grazing. Park effectiveness correlates with basic management activities such as enforcement, boundary demarcation, and direct compensation to local communities, suggesting that even modest increases in funding would directly increase the ability of parks to protect tropical biodiversity.

摘要

我们评估了人为威胁对22个热带国家93个保护区的影响,以检验公园是保护热带生物多样性的有效手段这一假设。我们发现,大多数公园在阻止土地开垦方面取得了成功,在减轻伐木、狩猎、火灾和放牧影响方面的成效较小。公园的有效性与执法、边界划定和对当地社区的直接补偿等基本管理活动相关,这表明即使资金略有增加也将直接提高公园保护热带生物多样性的能力。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.公园在保护热带生物多样性方面的有效性。
Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):125-8. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.125.
2
Linking management and livelihood in environmental conservation: case of the Korup National Park Cameroon.将环境保护中的管理与生计相联系:喀麦隆科鲁普国家公园的案例
J Environ Manage. 2005 Jul;76(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.009.
3
Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo.印度尼西亚婆罗洲保护区内的低地森林流失
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1000-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1091714.
4
Environmental synergisms and extinctions of tropical species.环境协同作用与热带物种灭绝。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Dec;23(6):1427-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01336.x.
5
Policy and practice in Myanmar's protected area system.缅甸保护区系统的政策与实践。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Jul;84(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
6
Effects of weed-management burning on reptile assemblages in Australian tropical savannas.杂草管理焚烧对澳大利亚热带稀树草原爬行动物群落的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01074.x. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
7
Climate change and tropical biodiversity: a new focus.气候变化与热带生物多样性:新焦点
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;27(3):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Effectiveness of Africa's tropical protected areas for maintaining forest cover.非洲热带保护区对维持森林覆盖的有效性。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):559-569. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12851. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
How does poaching affect the size of national parks?偷猎如何影响国家公园的规模?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Apr;23(4):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.019. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
10
Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance.人类对区域鸟类多样性和数量的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):405-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00881.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Coexistence of Sympatric Large Carnivores: Spatio-Temporal Interactions Between Tigers and Leopards in Parsa National Park, Nepal.同域大型食肉动物的共存:尼泊尔帕尔萨国家公园老虎与豹的时空相互作用
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 21;15(6):e71547. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71547. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Long-term vegetation dynamics in Spain's National Park Network: insights from remote sensing data.西班牙国家公园网络中的长期植被动态:来自遥感数据的见解。
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Jun 19;197(7):767. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14233-w.
3
Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000.
自2000年以来,合作管理伙伴关系极大地减少了非洲风险最高的保护区的森林砍伐。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2411348121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2411348121. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
4
Effectiveness of protected areas in the Caucasus Mountains in preventing rangeland degradation.高加索山脉保护区在防止牧场退化方面的成效。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Jun;39(3):e14415. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14415. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss.全球保护区在抵御生境丧失方面的混合效力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52693-9.
6
Towards understanding climate change impacts: monitoring the vegetation dynamics of terrestrial national parks in Indonesia.为了更好地理解气候变化的影响:监测印度尼西亚陆地国家公园的植被动态。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 6;14(1):18257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69276-9.
7
Private management of African protected areas improves wildlife and tourism outcomes but with security concerns in conflict regions.私营管理的非洲保护区改善了野生动物和旅游业的发展成果,但在冲突地区存在安全隐患。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 16;121(29):e2401814121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401814121. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
Mapping multi-seasonal habitats of giant pandas to identify seasonal shifts.绘制大熊猫的多季节栖息地以识别季节性变化。
iScience. 2024 Feb 5;27(3):109115. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109115. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
9
Historical and current distribution ranges of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus).历史和当前分布范围的亚洲黑熊(Ursus thibetanus)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51588-5.
10
Bird species richness and diversity responses to land use change in the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya.肯尼亚维多利亚湖流域土地利用变化对鸟类物种丰富度和多样性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):1711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52107-2.