Erfurth E M, Bülow B, Hagmar L E
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Pituitary. 2000 Oct;3(2):77-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1009901707125.
Hitherto four relevant cohort studies have been published on the life expectancy of patients with hypopituitarism, two from the UK and two from Sweden. In all four studies patients with acromegaly or Cushing's disease were excluded, and patients with GH replacement were not included. A crude meta-analysis, not considering differences in validity of the study designs, gives an overall Relative Risk (RR) of 1.47, with a relatively small 95% confidence interval of 1.27-1.70. The aim of this critical review was to assess whether lacking validity in the design of one or several of these studies indicates that the true RR might be higher or lower than indicated by meta-analyses. A high frequency of cranial irradiation in one of the Swedish cohorts may explain part of the very high observed RR for cerebrovascular mortality, but there remained a 40% risk increase for cardiac diseases that cannot be explained by irradiation. Some other validity problems, especially seen in the UK studies, will result in under-estimation of the true RR, but for others the direction of bias is uncertain due to lacking information in the original publications. According to our view, it is more probable that the observed overall 50% risk increase for vascular mortality is an under-estimation than an over-estimation of the true RR. This analysis is of a qualitative nature, and it is not possible to quantify to what extent the lacking validity may have affected the RR.
迄今为止,已发表了四项关于垂体功能减退症患者预期寿命的相关队列研究,两项来自英国,两项来自瑞典。在所有四项研究中,肢端肥大症或库欣病患者被排除在外,接受生长激素替代治疗的患者未被纳入。一项未考虑研究设计有效性差异的粗略荟萃分析得出的总体相对风险(RR)为1.47,95%置信区间相对较小,为1.27 - 1.70。这篇批判性综述的目的是评估这些研究中一项或多项研究设计缺乏有效性是否表明真实的RR可能高于或低于荟萃分析所示。瑞典的一个队列中颅脑照射频率较高,这可能部分解释了观察到的脑血管死亡率RR非常高的原因,但心脏病风险仍有40%的增加无法用照射来解释。其他一些有效性问题,特别是在英国的研究中发现的,将导致对真实RR的低估,但对于其他问题,由于原始出版物中缺乏信息,偏差方向尚不确定。根据我们的观点,观察到的血管死亡率总体风险增加50%更有可能是对真实RR的低估而非高估。这种分析是定性的,无法量化缺乏有效性可能在多大程度上影响了RR。