• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使知情同意适应当代管理式医疗。

Adapting informed consent to contemporary managed care.

作者信息

Sadan B

机构信息

Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem.

出版信息

Med Law. 2000;19(3):545-57.

PMID:11143889
Abstract

Patients' autonomy and rights have become inalienable values in most western countries. The instrument by which de facto patient autonomy in the healthcare system is practiced is the "informed consent" form. Despite the unquestionable importance of this tool, there are numerous inadequacies in this practice. One of the reasons is due to the fact that the physicians' autonomy to offer their patients the best care available has undergone considerable diminution due to financial considerations in the managed care environment. The healthcare system is a multifaceted one, made up of many agents and interested parties who lay down the laws and make the rules of the game. A physician-patient encounter does not take place in a void, and physicians are far less free to act than they have ever been before. This diminished independence is particularly felt in the milieu of managed care and has led to informed consent taking on a new and much greater significance when there are patient-"unfriendly" agendas.

摘要

在大多数西方国家,患者的自主权和权利已成为不可剥夺的价值观。在医疗保健系统中实际践行患者自主权的工具是“知情同意”书。尽管这一工具具有毋庸置疑的重要性,但在实践中存在诸多不足之处。原因之一是,在管理式医疗环境下,由于经济因素,医生为患者提供最佳可用医疗服务的自主权已大幅减少。医疗保健系统是一个多方面的体系,由许多制定法律和游戏规则的机构及利益相关方组成。医患会面并非在真空中进行,医生的行动自由比以往任何时候都少得多。在管理式医疗环境中,这种独立性的减弱尤为明显,并且当存在对患者“不友好”的议程时,这使得知情同意具有了新的、更为重要的意义。

相似文献

1
Adapting informed consent to contemporary managed care.使知情同意适应当代管理式医疗。
Med Law. 2000;19(3):545-57.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Patient autonomy and physician responsibility].[患者自主权与医生责任]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1994 Oct;88(10):733-42.
4
Physicians and patients' legal rights, Part II: Rushing to judgment in terminal care? A Geriatrics panel discussion.医生与患者的合法权利,第二部分:在临终关怀中急于下判断?老年医学专家小组讨论
Geriatrics. 1989 Oct;44(10):58-60, 71-2, 74.
5
Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.增强患者自主性的方法(以及可能的禁忌症)。
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Fall;5(3):179-88.
6
The cautious acceptance of informed consent in Japan.日本对知情同意的谨慎接纳。
Med Law. 1997;16(4):705-20.
7
Has society in the USA really given informed consent to managed health care?美国社会真的对管理式医疗保健给予了知情同意吗?
Revolution. 1998 Summer;8(2):48-54, 59-61.
8
Informed consent: from the ambivalence of Arato to the thunder of Thor.知情同意:从阿拉托的矛盾心理到托尔的雷霆之势。
Issues Law Med. 1994 Winter;10(3):261-98.
9
Enforcing patient preferences. Linking payment for medical care to informed consent.执行患者偏好。将医疗支付与知情同意挂钩。
JAMA. 1989 Apr 7;261(13):1935-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.261.13.1935.
10
[Patients' autonomy and patients' rights].[患者的自主权与患者权利]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Sep;55(9):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1529-9.

引用本文的文献

1
What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.在知情同意程序中,患者真正想了解什么?对英国巴斯地区患者进行的一项问卷调查。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Oct;32(10):612-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013334.