• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[患者的自主权与患者权利]

[Patients' autonomy and patients' rights].

作者信息

Katzenmeier C

机构信息

Institut für Medizinrecht, Universität zu Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Sep;55(9):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1529-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-012-1529-9
PMID:22936475
Abstract

Patient autonomy is a valuable asset. Under German law, the patient's right to self-determination is ensured by a corresponding duty of the physician to inform. Owing to various case laws of the courts over the last few decades, that duty, in all of its aspects (i.e., informing the patient about risks and benefits, about the diagnosis, about the course of treatment, about necessary patient compliance, and about potential treatment costs) has gained enormous jurisdictional and scientific attention as well as forensic importance. Established court practice has become highly elaborated and differentiated. Some precedents have, nevertheless, exceeded reasonable requirements for physicians, and moderation is advisable. The current plans concerning a Statute on the Protection of Patients' Rights in Germany aim at laying down the specific requirements for patients' informed consent, including what information has to be communicated and in what way. Such a goal is difficult, especially in light of regulatory techniques. The discussion about the statute seldom addresses the fact that the suitability of legal norms as a means for public guidance can be limited; in particular, they do not guarantee that a dialogue between patient and physician about risks and benefits will ensue on the basis of a partnership. Over-regulation can damage faith and confidence in the relationship between patients and physicians.

摘要

患者自主权是一项宝贵的资产。根据德国法律,医生相应的告知义务确保了患者的自决权。由于过去几十年法院的各种判例法,该义务的各个方面(即告知患者风险与益处、诊断情况、治疗过程、患者必要的配合以及潜在的治疗费用)受到了极大的司法和科学关注以及法医学重视。既定的法院实践已变得高度精细和有区别。然而,一些先例对医生的要求超出了合理范围,适度为宜。德国目前关于《患者权利保护法》的计划旨在规定患者知情同意的具体要求,包括必须传达哪些信息以及以何种方式传达。鉴于监管技术,这样一个目标很难实现。关于该法律的讨论很少涉及到这样一个事实,即法律规范作为公共指导手段的适用性可能是有限的;特别是,它们不能保证患者和医生会在伙伴关系的基础上就风险与益处展开对话。过度监管可能会损害患者与医生之间关系中的信任。

相似文献

1
[Patients' autonomy and patients' rights].[患者的自主权与患者权利]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Sep;55(9):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1529-9.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Patient autonomy and informed consent - ethical and legal issues].[患者自主权与知情同意——伦理与法律问题]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2015 Mar;50(3):202-9; quiz 210. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-100220. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
[Health care power of attorney project at the University Hospital Frankfurt].[法兰克福大学医院的医疗委托授权项目]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2015 Mar;50(3):212-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-100629. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
The influence of the law on patient's rights on the practice of the Flemish paediatricians anno 2010.2010年法律对患者权利的规定对比利时弗拉芒地区儿科医生执业的影响
Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Jul-Aug;112(4):297-301.
6
[Patients' rights--doctors' duties].[患者权利——医生职责]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2015 Jun 1;67(2):70-4.
7
[Physicians responsibility for informed consent in Austrian law].[奥地利法律中医生在知情同意方面的责任]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2001;151(9-10):195-9.
8
[Placebo and the relationship between doctors and patients. Overview].[安慰剂与医患关系。综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Sep;55(9):1113-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1526-z.
9
Bioethics committees and examining consent within the patient-physician relationship in Turkey.土耳其的生物伦理委员会与医患关系中的知情同意审查
Med Law. 2010 Sep;29(3):403-18.
10
[Provision of information to patients. Legal and humanitarian requirements].
Urologe A. 2008 Aug;47(8):1009-16; quiz 1017-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1854-7.