Miksić K, Flis V, Pavlović M, Teticković E
Department of Vascular Surgery, Maribor Teaching Hospital, Maribor, Slovenia.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000 Nov 10;112(21):934-8.
The purpose of the present paper is to analyse diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of carotid body tumours. Seven patients with carotid body tumour underwent surgery at our department between 1982 and 1998. All of them had an asymptomatic cervical lateral mass. The preoperative evaluation included angiography in 7 patients, duplex scanning in 2 patients and computed tomography in one patient. Tumour excision was performed in 5. Carotid artery resection with the tumour was required in 2 patients and in both, interposition of a 5-mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft was performed. During the resection, temporary carotid shunt was required in one patient. Perioperative transcranial Doppler was used once; the use of a shunt during carotid artery resection was not required in the second case. All tumours were identified as carotid paragangliomas without evidence of malignancy. There was no mortality and no hemiplegia. After surgery, temporary cranial nerve dysfunction was noted in 2 cases. In the follow-up period of 2 to 14 years (mean, 7 years), no recurrent disease occurred. Patency of the grafts was good at 4 and 7 years after carotid artery reconstruction. We conclude that with non-invasive investigation and arteriography it is possible to obtain an early and precise diagnosis. The decision to perform simple tumour excision or additional arterial resection is based on diagnostic preoperative as well as intraoperative evaluation of the individual tumour. As demonstrated in our cases, after resection of the internal carotid artery a polytetrafluoroethylene graft may be used for carotid reconstruction. Early surgery is recommended because it minimises the risk of complications associated with large tumours.
本文旨在分析颈动脉体瘤的诊断与治疗方面。1982年至1998年间,我们科室有7例颈动脉体瘤患者接受了手术。他们均有无症状的颈部侧方肿块。术前评估中,7例患者进行了血管造影,2例进行了双功扫描,1例进行了计算机断层扫描。5例患者进行了肿瘤切除术。2例患者需要连同肿瘤一起切除颈动脉,并均进行了5毫米聚四氟乙烯移植物的置入。在切除过程中,1例患者需要临时颈动脉分流。围手术期使用了一次经颅多普勒;第二例患者在颈动脉切除过程中不需要使用分流。所有肿瘤均被确诊为颈动脉副神经节瘤,无恶性证据。无死亡病例,也无偏瘫发生。术后,2例患者出现了暂时性脑神经功能障碍。在2至14年(平均7年)的随访期内,无复发病例。颈动脉重建术后4年和7年时,移植物通畅良好。我们得出结论,通过非侵入性检查和动脉造影有可能获得早期精确诊断。决定进行单纯肿瘤切除还是额外的动脉切除,是基于术前诊断以及术中对单个肿瘤的评估。如我们的病例所示,切除颈内动脉后,可使用聚四氟乙烯移植物进行颈动脉重建。建议早期手术,因为它可将与大肿瘤相关的并发症风险降至最低。