Kasper Gregory C, Welling Richard E, Wladis Alan R, CaJacob Daniel E, Grisham Andre D, Tomsick Thomas A, Gluckman Jack L, Muck Patrick E
Sections of Vascular, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006;40(6):467-74. doi: 10.1177/1538574406290254.
The surgical management of carotid paragangliomas can be problematic. A multidisciplinary approach was used to include vascular surgery, otolaryngology, and neuroradiology to treat these patients over 9 years. From January 1992 to July 2001, a multidisciplinary team evaluated patients with carotid paragangliomas. Analyzed patient data included age, gender, diagnostic evaluation, tumor size, preoperative tumor embolization, operative exposure, need for extracranial arterial sacrifice/reconstruction, postoperative morbidity including cranial nerve dysfunction, and long-term follow-up. Twenty-five carotid paragangliomas in 20 patients underwent multidisciplinary evaluation and management. Average age was 51 years (range, 28-83 years), and 52% were male. Diagnostic evaluation included computed tomography in 76%, magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography in 52%, catheter angiography in 60%, and duplex ultrasonography in 16%. An extended neck exposure was required in 11 cases (44%), mandibulotomy was used once (4%), and mandibular subluxation was never required. The external carotid artery (ECA) was sacrificed in 8 cases (32%). The carotid bifurcation was resected in 1 patient (4%) requiring interposition reconstruction of the internal carotid artery. Preoperative tumor embolization was performed for 13 tumors (52%). Operative blood loss for patients undergoing preoperative embolization (Group I) was comparable to the nonembolized group (group II): group I lost 365 +/-180 mL versus 360 +/- 101 mL for group II (P = .48). This occurred despite larger tumors (group I - 4.2 cm versus group II - 2.1 cm, P = .03) and a higher mean Shamblin class (group I - 2.5 versus group II - 1.45, P = .001) for group I. There were no perioperative mortalities. Transient cranial nerve dysfunction occurred in 13 CBTs (52%), 2 (8%) of which remained present after 4 months. Patients with carotid paragangliomas benefit from a multidisciplinary team approach. Neuroradiology has been used for selective preoperative embolization, which has decreased estimated blood loss during excision of larger complex tumors. A combined surgical team of otolaryngology and vascular surgery provides for exposure of the distal internal carotid artery as high as the skull base, limited permanent cranial nerve dysfunction, and selective early division and excision of the external carotid artery for complete tumor resection.
颈动脉体瘤的外科治疗颇具挑战性。在9年多的时间里,采用了多学科方法,涵盖血管外科、耳鼻喉科和神经放射科来治疗这些患者。从1992年1月至2001年7月,一个多学科团队对颈动脉体瘤患者进行了评估。分析的患者数据包括年龄、性别、诊断评估、肿瘤大小、术前肿瘤栓塞、手术暴露、颅外动脉牺牲/重建的必要性、术后并发症(包括脑神经功能障碍)以及长期随访。20例患者的25个颈动脉体瘤接受了多学科评估和治疗。平均年龄为51岁(范围28 - 83岁),52%为男性。诊断评估包括76%的患者进行了计算机断层扫描,52%进行了磁共振成像/磁共振血管造影,60%进行了导管血管造影,16%进行了双功超声检查。11例患者(44%)需要扩大颈部暴露,1例(4%)采用了下颌骨切开术,从未需要下颌骨半脱位。8例患者(32%)牺牲了颈外动脉。1例患者(4%)切除了颈动脉分叉,需要对颈内动脉进行间置重建。13个肿瘤(52%)进行了术前肿瘤栓塞。接受术前栓塞的患者(第一组)的术中失血量与未栓塞组(第二组)相当:第一组失血量为365±180 mL,第二组为360±101 mL(P = 0.48)。尽管第一组肿瘤更大(第一组 - 4.2 cm,第二组 - 2.1 cm,P = 0.03)且平均Shamblin分级更高(第一组 - 2.5,第二组 - 1.45,P = 0.001),但仍出现了这种情况。围手术期无死亡病例。13例颈动脉体瘤患者(52%)出现了短暂性脑神经功能障碍,其中2例(8%)在4个月后仍存在。颈动脉体瘤患者受益于多学科团队方法。神经放射学已用于选择性术前栓塞,这减少了较大复杂肿瘤切除过程中的估计失血量。耳鼻喉科和血管外科的联合手术团队能够暴露高达颅底的颈内动脉远端,限制永久性脑神经功能障碍,并选择性地早期切断和切除颈外动脉以实现肿瘤的完全切除。