• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比随机化对自然场景幅度谱斜率变化辨别能力的影响。

The effect of contrast randomisation on the discrimination of changes in the slopes of the amplitude spectra of natural scenes.

作者信息

Párraga C A, Tolhurst D J

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 2000;29(9):1101-16. doi: 10.1068/p2904.

DOI:10.1068/p2904
PMID:11144822
Abstract

It has been suggested (Tadmor and Tolhurst, 1994 Vision Research 34 541-554) that the psychophysical task of discriminating changes in the slope of the amplitude spectrum of a complex image may be similar to detecting differences in the degree of blur. It has also been suggested that human observers may perform this discrimination by detecting changes in the effective contrast within single narrow spatial-frequency bands, rather than by detecting changes in the slope per se which would involve the use of contrast information across many different frequency bands. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we have developed an experiment where observers were asked to discriminate changes in the spectral slope while different amounts of random contrast variation were introduced, with the purpose of disrupting their performance. This disruptive effect was designed to be particularly manifest if the observer really was performing a single-frequency-band contrast discrimination but to be unnoticeable if the observer was discriminating the change of slope per se. Our results imply that the observers do not usually detect changes in contrast in just one narrow spatial-frequency band when they discriminate changes in the slope of the amplitude spectrum. Rather, they must compare contrast between bands or, at least, they use contrast information from more than one band. However, for edge-enhanced (whitened) pictures, there is some evidence to suggest that observers rely on contrast changes in only a limited low-spatial-frequency band.

摘要

有人提出(塔德莫尔和托尔赫斯特,1994年《视觉研究》34卷541 - 554页),辨别复杂图像幅度谱斜率变化的心理物理学任务可能类似于检测模糊程度的差异。也有人提出,人类观察者可能通过检测单个窄空间频率带内有效对比度的变化来进行这种辨别,而不是通过检测斜率本身的变化,因为检测斜率本身的变化需要使用跨越许多不同频带的对比度信息。为了区分这两种可能性,我们设计了一个实验,要求观察者在引入不同量的随机对比度变化时辨别频谱斜率的变化,目的是干扰他们的表现。如果观察者真的是在进行单频带对比度辨别,这种干扰效应会特别明显;而如果观察者是在辨别斜率本身的变化,这种干扰效应则不会被注意到。我们的结果表明,观察者在辨别幅度谱斜率变化时,通常不会只在一个窄空间频率带内检测对比度的变化。相反,他们必须比较不同频带之间的对比度,或者至少,他们使用来自多个频带的对比度信息。然而,对于边缘增强(白化)的图片,有一些证据表明观察者仅依赖于有限的低空间频率带内的对比度变化。

相似文献

1
The effect of contrast randomisation on the discrimination of changes in the slopes of the amplitude spectra of natural scenes.对比随机化对自然场景幅度谱斜率变化辨别能力的影响。
Perception. 2000;29(9):1101-16. doi: 10.1068/p2904.
2
Band-limited contrast in natural images explains the detectability of changes in the amplitude spectra.自然图像中的带限对比度解释了幅度谱变化的可检测性。
Vision Res. 1997 Dec;37(23):3203-15. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00119-3.
3
The effects of amplitude-spectrum statistics on foveal and peripheral discrimination of changes in natural images, and a multi-resolution model.幅度谱统计对自然图像变化的中央凹和周边辨别力的影响以及一种多分辨率模型。
Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3145-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
4
Discrimination of changes in the slopes of the amplitude spectra of natural images: band-limited contrast and psychometric functions.自然图像幅度谱斜率变化的辨别:带限对比度与心理测量函数
Perception. 1997;26(8):1011-25. doi: 10.1068/p261011.
5
Discrimination of spectrally blended natural images: optimisation of the human visual system for encoding natural images.光谱混合自然图像的辨别:人类视觉系统对自然图像编码的优化。
Perception. 2000;29(9):1087-100. doi: 10.1068/p3015.
6
The magnitude of center-surround facilitation in the discrimination of amplitude spectrum is dependent on the amplitude of the surround.在幅度谱辨别中,中心-外周易化的程度取决于外周的幅度。
J Vis. 2011 Jun 17;11(7):14. doi: 10.1167/11.7.14.
7
Sinusoid = light bar + dark bar?正弦波 = 亮条 + 暗条?
Vision Res. 2006 Jun;46(12):1934-45. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
8
Thresholds for the detection of changing visual features.检测视觉特征变化的阈值。
Perception. 2011;40(4):409-21. doi: 10.1068/p6890.
9
Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.V1区的反应抑制与周边掩蔽的心理物理学结果相符。
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 30;23(17):6884-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06884.2003.
10
Visual discrimination of spectral distributions.光谱分布的视觉辨别
Perception. 2004;33(12):1483-97. doi: 10.1068/p5324.

引用本文的文献

1
Discriminating natural image statistics from neuronal population codes.区分自然图像统计数据和神经元群体代码。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 25;5(3):e9704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009704.