Zenger-Landolt Barbara, Heeger David J
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 30;23(17):6884-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06884.2003.
When a target stimulus is embedded in a high contrast surround, the target appears reduced in contrast and is harder to detect, and neural responses in visual cortex are suppressed. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysics to quantitatively compare these physiological and perceptual effects. Observers performed a contrast discrimination task on a contrast-reversing sinusoidal target grating. The target was either presented in isolation or embedded in a high-contrast surround. While observers performed the task, we also measured fMRI responses as a function of target contrast, both with and without a surround. We found that the surround substantially increased the psychophysical thresholds while reducing fMRI responses. The two data sets were compared, on the basis of the assumption that a fixed response difference is required for correct discrimination, and we found that the psychophysics accounted for 96.5% of the variance in the measured V1 responses. The suppression in visual areas V2 and V3 was stronger, too strong to agree with psychophysics. The good quantitative agreement between psychophysical thresholds and V1 responses suggests V1 as a plausible candidate for mediating surround masking.
当一个目标刺激嵌入高对比度的背景中时,目标的对比度会降低,更难被检测到,并且视觉皮层中的神经反应会受到抑制。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和心理物理学来定量比较这些生理和感知效应。观察者对对比度反转的正弦目标光栅执行对比度辨别任务。目标要么单独呈现,要么嵌入高对比度背景中。当观察者执行任务时,我们还测量了有无背景情况下作为目标对比度函数的fMRI反应。我们发现背景显著提高了心理物理学阈值,同时降低了fMRI反应。基于正确辨别需要固定反应差异这一假设,对这两个数据集进行了比较,我们发现心理物理学解释了测量到的V1反应中96.5%的方差。V2和V3视觉区域的抑制更强,强到与心理物理学不一致。心理物理学阈值与V1反应之间良好的定量一致性表明V1是介导背景掩蔽的一个合理候选者。