Wakefield R J, Gibbon W W, Conaghan P G, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, Green M J, Veale D J, Isaacs J D, Emery P
University of Leeds, UK.
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Dec;43(12):2762-70. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2762::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-#.
The ability to make an early, accurate diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become increasingly important with the availability of new, expensive, and targeted therapies. However, plain radiography, the traditional method of detecting the characteristic bone erosions and an important adjunct in establishing a diagnosis of RA, is known to be insensitive. This study compared sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of patients with RA.
One hundred RA patients (including 40 with early disease) underwent posteroanterior radiography and sonography of the MCP joints of the dominant hand. Twenty asymptomatic control subjects also underwent sonography. Erosion sites were recorded and subsequently compared using each modality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on the second MCP joint in 25 patients with early RA to confirm the pathologic specificity of sonographic erosions. Intraobserver reliability of sonography readings was assessed using video recordings of 55 MCP joint scans of RA patients, and interobserver reliability was assessed by comparing 160 MCP joint scans performed sequentially by 2 independent observers.
Sonography detected 127 definite erosions in 56 of 100 RA patients, compared with radiographic detection of 32 erosions (26 [81%] of which coincided with sonographic erosions) in 17 of 100 patients (P < 0.0001). In early disease, sonography detected 6.5-fold more erosions than did radiography, in 7.5-fold the number of patients. In late disease, these differences were 3.4-fold and 2.7-fold, respectively. On MRI, all sonographic erosions not visible on radiography (n = 12) corresponded by site to MRI abnormalities. The Cohen-kappa values for intra- and interobserver reliability of sonography were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively.
Sonography is a reliable technique that detects more erosions than radiography, especially in early RA. Sonographic erosions not seen on radiography corresponded to MRI bone abnormalities. This technology has potential in the management of patients with early RA/inflammatory arthritis and is likely to have major implications for the future practice of rheumatology.
随着新型、昂贵且有针对性的治疗方法的出现,对类风湿关节炎(RA)进行早期、准确诊断的能力变得越来越重要。然而,传统的检测特征性骨侵蚀的方法——普通X线摄影,在RA诊断中作为一项重要辅助手段,已知其敏感性较低。本研究比较了现代成像技术超声检查与传统X线摄影在检测RA患者掌指(MCP)关节侵蚀方面的差异。
100例RA患者(包括40例早期患者)对优势手的MCP关节进行后前位X线摄影和超声检查。20名无症状对照者也接受了超声检查。记录侵蚀部位,随后使用每种检查方法进行比较。对25例早期RA患者的第二MCP关节进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以确认超声侵蚀的病理特异性。通过对55例RA患者MCP关节扫描的视频记录评估超声检查读数的观察者内可靠性,并通过比较2名独立观察者依次进行的160例MCP关节扫描评估观察者间可靠性。
100例RA患者中有56例超声检查发现127处明确侵蚀,而X线摄影在100例患者中的17例检测到32处侵蚀(其中26处[81%]与超声侵蚀一致)(P < 0.0001)。在早期疾病中,超声检查发现的侵蚀比X线摄影多6.5倍,涉及患者数量多7.5倍。在晚期疾病中,这些差异分别为3.4倍和2.7倍。在MRI上,所有X线摄影未见的超声侵蚀(n = 12)在部位上与MRI异常相对应。超声检查的观察者内和观察者间可靠性的Cohen-kappa值分别为0.75和0.76。
超声检查是一种可靠的技术,比X线摄影能检测到更多的侵蚀,尤其是在早期RA中。X线摄影未见的超声侵蚀与MRI骨异常相对应。这项技术在早期RA/炎性关节炎患者的管理中具有潜力,可能对未来风湿病学的实践产生重大影响。