Suppr超能文献

实验室多导睡眠图对睡眠及客观日间嗜睡的影响。

The effect of in-laboratory polysomnography on sleep and objective daytime sleepiness.

作者信息

Kingshott R N, Douglas N J

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine Unit, The University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sleep. 2000 Dec 15;23(8):1109-13.

Abstract

MSLT guidelines recommend performing MSLTs following polysomnography (PSG) to document the preceding night's sleep. We tested the hypothesis that patients are objectively sleepier after in-laboratory full diagnostic PSG than after a sleep recording at home. Sixteen patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS; AHI 35+/-SD 28 per hour slept) were recruited into a randomized crossover study. To monitor sleep with minimal disruption at home, only sleep was recorded on 2 consecutive nights, the first for acclimatization. The laboratory limb followed standard PSG. Both study nights were followed next day by MSLT and MWT. There were no differences in MSLT (12.0 SD 5.1 home, 11.6+/-4.7 min laboratory; p=0.7), MWT (32.7+/-8.7, 31.6+/-9.3 min; p=0.6) or total sleep time (362+/-53, 343+/-51 min; p=0.15) between home and laboratory limbs. However, on the home night, fewer microarousals (31+/-14, 54+/-25/hr slept; p<0.0001) and less % wake (15+/-10, 24+/-11; p=0.006) were found. On the home study night, patients had greater % REM sleep, slow-wave sleep and sleep efficiency (all p<0.009). This study does not support the hypothesis that patients are sleepier after laboratory PSG compared to home study night. However, the improved sleep at home raises the question whether laboratory-based polysomnography is always required prior to MSLT/MWT testing or whether less obtrusive monitoring of sleep duration at home would sometimes suffice.

摘要

多导睡眠图(PSG)指南建议在进行多导睡眠图检查后进行多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT),以记录前一晚的睡眠情况。我们检验了这样一个假设:与在家中进行睡眠记录相比,患者在实验室进行全面诊断性多导睡眠图检查后会出现更明显的困倦。16名患有睡眠呼吸暂停/低通气综合征(SAHS;平均每小时睡眠呼吸暂停低通气指数35±标准差28)的患者被纳入一项随机交叉研究。为了在家中以最小的干扰监测睡眠,仅连续两晚记录睡眠情况,第一晚用于适应环境。实验室部分遵循标准的多导睡眠图检查流程。两个研究夜晚之后的第二天均进行多次睡眠潜伏期试验和多次清醒维持试验。在家中和实验室部分之间,多次睡眠潜伏期试验(在家中为12.0±标准差5.1分钟,在实验室为11.6±4.7分钟;p = 0.7)、多次清醒维持试验(分别为32.7±8.7分钟和31.6±9.3分钟;p = 0.6)或总睡眠时间(分别为362±53分钟和343±51分钟;p = 0.15)均无差异。然而,在家中睡眠的那一晚,微觉醒次数更少(每小时睡眠中分别为31±14次和54±25次;p < 0.0001),觉醒百分比更低(分别为15±10%和24±11%;p = 0.006)。在家中研究夜晚,患者的快速眼动睡眠百分比、慢波睡眠和睡眠效率更高(所有p < 0.009)。本研究不支持与在家中研究夜晚相比,患者在实验室进行多导睡眠图检查后更困倦这一假设。然而,在家中睡眠质量的改善引发了一个问题,即多次睡眠潜伏期试验/多次清醒维持试验之前是否总是需要基于实验室的多导睡眠图检查,或者在家中进行对睡眠时长干扰较小的监测有时是否就足够了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验