• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于原则的体外除颤波形多中心研究。

Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.

作者信息

Bain A C, Swerdlow C D, Love C J, Ellenbogen K A, Deering T F, Brewer J E, Augostini R S, Tchou P J

机构信息

Survivalink Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):5-12. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111690.

DOI:10.1067/mem.2001.111690
PMID:11145764
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks.

RESULTS

The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% (95% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2.

CONCLUSION

Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.

摘要

研究目的

用于体外除颤的电击波形的疗效取决于波形特征。最近,基于心脏电生理学的设计原则已被开发出来以确定最佳波形特征。本临床试验的目的是评估基于原则的单相和双相波形用于体外除颤的疗效。

方法

对118例接受电生理检查或植入式除颤器的患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、盲法、多中心研究。诱发室颤,并尝试用双相和单相波形对每位患者进行除颤。患者被随机分为两组:第1组接受能量递增的电击,第2组仅接受高能量电击。

结果

双相波形在第1组(95%置信区间[CI]95.1%至100%)和第2组(95%CI94.6%至100%)中首次电击成功率达到100%,平均释放能量分别为201±17J和295±28J。单相波形在第1组中的首次电击成功率为96.7%(95%CI89.1%至100%),平均释放能量为215±12J;在第2组中的首次电击成功率为98.2%(95%CI91.7%至100%),平均释放能量为352±13J。

结论

利用电生理学原理,可以设计出用于体外除颤的双相和单相波形,使其首次电击疗效较高。

相似文献

1
Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.基于原则的体外除颤波形多中心研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):5-12. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111690.
2
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).院外心脏骤停从直线双相波到单相波衰减正弦波除颤波形与高级生命支持干预试验(ORBIT)
Resuscitation. 2005 Aug;66(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.031.
3
BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.双相波试验:院外心脏骤停时固定较低能量与递增较高能量水平除颤的随机对照比较。
Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1511-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.648204. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
4
Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.急救人员经胸递增单相与双相除颤(TIMBER):单相与双相波形递增能量除颤用于室颤所致院外心脏骤停复苏的随机对照研究
Circulation. 2006 Nov 7;114(19):2010-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.636506. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
5
External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.心房颤动的体外心脏复律:双相波与单相波电击的比较。
Europace. 2001 Apr;3(2):96-9. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2001.0156.
6
Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.短阵室颤猪模型中脉冲双相波形与直线双相波形疗效的比较。
Resuscitation. 2009 Sep;80(9):1047-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
7
[Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].[心房颤动患者的经胸心脏复律:三种不同波形的比较]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004 Jan;5(1):36-43.
8
A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.一项关于使用伟伦MRL PIC双相波形与衰减正弦单相波形进行体外直流电复律后的疗效及ST段变化的随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
9
Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.双相波与单相波电击用于心房扑动体外复律的前瞻性随机试验
Cardiology. 2008;111(1):57-62. doi: 10.1159/000113429. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
10
Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.通过固定持续时间波形和使用多个时间常数来实现足够的安全裕度。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):596-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00718.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Resuscitation Outcomes Between 2- or 3-Stacked Defibrillation Strategies With Minimally Interrupted Chest Compression and the Single Defibrillation Strategy: A Swine Cardiac Arrest Model.两种或三种叠瓦式除颤策略与最小中断胸部按压和单次除颤策略在复苏结果方面的比较:猪心搏骤停模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021250. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021250. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
[Life-threatening brady- and tachyarrhythmias].[危及生命的缓慢性和快速性心律失常]
Internist (Berl). 2010 Aug;51(8):975-6, 978-80, 982-6. doi: 10.1007/s00108-009-2539-z.
3
Extended charge banking model of dual path shocks for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
植入式心脏复律除颤器双路径电击的扩展电荷存储模型
Biomed Eng Online. 2008 Aug 1;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-7-22.
4
Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation.成人心肺复苏的最新进展与争议
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Oct;83(984):649-54. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057133.
5
[Transthoracic defibrillation. Physiologic and pathophysiologic principles and their role in the outcome of resuscitation].[经胸除颤。生理与病理生理原理及其在复苏结局中的作用]
Anaesthesist. 2004 Feb;53(2):125-36. doi: 10.1007/s00101-003-0635-3.