Suppr超能文献

股动脉闭合装置的并发症。

Complications of femoral artery closure devices.

作者信息

Carey D, Martin J R, Moore C A, Valentine M C, Nygaard T W

机构信息

Stroobants Heart Center, Lynchburg General Hospital, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Jan;52(1):3-7; discussion 8. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200101)52:1<3::aid-ccd1002>3.0.co;2-g.

Abstract

We have examined our prospectively collected experience with femoral artery closure devices. Vasoseal (n = 937), Angioseal (N-742), and Techstar (n = 1001) were utilized consecutively in our laboratory for diagnostic and interventional femoral artery closures. Complications were compared to a similar number of closures with manual compression (MC; n = 1019) before closure devices were utilized. The incidence of surgical repair, acute femoral closure, transfusion due to groin complications, readmission for groin complications, infection, and total complications were examined. We found that the Vasoseal and Angioseal devices were associated with higher rates of total complications than manual compression. The Techstar and manual compression had similar total complication rates. Acute femoral artery occlusion was a potentially serious complication with the Angioseal device. Groin infection occurred with each of the closure devices but not with manual compression.

摘要

我们回顾了前瞻性收集的使用股动脉闭合装置的经验。在我们实验室中,依次使用了Vasoseal(n = 937)、Angioseal(N = 742)和Techstar(n = 1001)进行诊断性和介入性股动脉闭合。在使用闭合装置之前,将并发症与通过手法压迫进行的类似数量的闭合(手法压迫;n = 1019)进行了比较。检查了手术修复、急性股动脉闭合、因腹股沟并发症输血、因腹股沟并发症再次入院、感染及总并发症的发生率。我们发现,Vasoseal和Angioseal装置与比手法压迫更高的总并发症发生率相关。Techstar和手法压迫的总并发症发生率相似。急性股动脉闭塞是Angioseal装置的一种潜在严重并发症。每种闭合装置均出现了腹股沟感染,但手法压迫未出现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验