Di Girolamo G, de los Santos A R, Martí M L, Valdés Quintana E, Godoy M I, Morano M A, Palomino G, Fandiño D, Greggio A
School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2000;20(1-2):31-40.
The aim of this double-blind study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of propinox administered i.v. and to establish a dose-response relationship according to three dose levels (10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg), vs. placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe acute intestinal colic pain. Four hundred patients (100 per treatment group) were included and allocated to the following treatment groups: propinox 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg and placebo. All treatments induced significant and progressive pain reduction as from the 20 min evaluation of 20.3% in the placebo group, 45% in the group treated with propinox 10 mg; 52% in the group receiving propinox 20 mg and 56% in the propinox 30 mg group. Statistical comparison showed differences between placebo and the three active doses as well as between propinox 10 mg and the 20 mg and 30 mg doses. The 20 min evaluation revealed that 40% of patients receiving placebo had to be excluded from the study due to lack of efficacy; the percentage of which was significantly higher compared with those observed with the three doses of propinox ranging between 10% and 13%. The 120 min evaluation revealed that 47.7% of patients treated with propinox 10 mg were free from pain vs. 68.8% and 73.5% of those receiving 20 mg and 30 mg, respectively. These percentages were considerably higher than the 15% found with placebo. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the 10 mg vs. the 20 mg and 30 mg groups with not differences between the latter doses. No differences in blood pressure or heart rate were found among treatments. The incidence of mouth dryness was significantly more frequent with the 20 mg and 30 mg doses of propinox than with the placebo or the 10 mg dose.
这项双盲研究的目的是评估静脉注射丙氧氨酚的疗效和耐受性,并根据三个剂量水平(10毫克、20毫克和30毫克)建立剂量反应关系,与安慰剂相比,用于治疗中重度急性肠道绞痛疼痛的患者。纳入了400名患者(每个治疗组100名),并分配到以下治疗组:丙氧氨酚10毫克、20毫克、30毫克和安慰剂。所有治疗均导致疼痛显著且逐渐减轻,从20分钟评估时开始,安慰剂组为20.3%,丙氧氨酚10毫克治疗组为45%;接受丙氧氨酚20毫克治疗组为52%,丙氧氨酚30毫克治疗组为56%。统计比较显示安慰剂与三个活性剂量之间以及丙氧氨酚10毫克与20毫克和30毫克剂量之间存在差异。20分钟评估显示,40%接受安慰剂治疗的患者因疗效不佳而不得不退出研究;这一比例明显高于使用三个剂量丙氧氨酚观察到的10%至13%。120分钟评估显示,丙氧氨酚10毫克治疗的患者中有47.7%无疼痛,而接受20毫克和30毫克治疗的患者分别为68.8%和73.5%。这些百分比远高于安慰剂组的15%。统计分析显示10毫克组与20毫克和30毫克组之间存在显著差异,而后两个剂量组之间无差异。各治疗组之间未发现血压或心率有差异。丙氧氨酚20毫克和30毫克剂量组口干的发生率明显高于安慰剂组或10毫克剂量组。