• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The changing nature of organ procurement policies and the implications for the UK.

作者信息

Randhawa G

机构信息

Faculty of Health Care & Social Studies, University of Luton, The Spires, 2 Adelaide Street, Luton, LU1 5DU, UK.

出版信息

J Health Soc Policy. 2001;12(3):53-74. doi: 10.1300/j045v12n03_04.

DOI:10.1300/j045v12n03_04
PMID:11146983
Abstract

The shift away from socialized forms of welfare over the past twenty years has changed the symbolic basis on which bodily parts are exchanged. Titmuss viewed the newly-formed National Health Service in the United Kingdom as a vehicle for institutionalizing altruistic practices, notably the voluntary "gift" of blood to strangers represented by the transfusion service. More recent advances in medical technology have made new forms of bodily tissue donation possible, including the transplantation of whole organs. Yet the excess of demand over supply is forcing a change from the principle of voluntarism on which "opting-in" procurement arrangements have hitherto rested to one of presumed consent and the system of "opting-out" adopted in other countries. The implications of this transition within the context of late twentieth century multi-cultural Britain are examined.

摘要

相似文献

1
The changing nature of organ procurement policies and the implications for the UK.
J Health Soc Policy. 2001;12(3):53-74. doi: 10.1300/j045v12n03_04.
2
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
3
Using reciprocity to motivate organ donations.利用互惠原则推动器官捐献。
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2005 Winter;5(1):293-325.
4
How to increase organ donation: does opting out have a role?如何增加器官捐献:选择退出有作用吗?
Transplantation. 2012 Jan 27;93(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823a2411.
5
Incentives for organ donation: pros and cons.器官捐赠的激励措施:利弊
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(6):1793-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.05.038.
6
Could the organ shortage ever be met?器官短缺问题能够得到解决吗?
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0023-1. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
UK policy initiatives and the effect on increasing organ donation.英国的政策举措及其对增加器官捐赠的影响。
Br J Nurs. 2016;25(6):307-11. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.6.307.
8
Is altruism enough? Required request and the donation of cadaver organs and tissues in the United States.
Crit Care Clin. 1990 Oct;6(4):1007-18.
9
Do we need to change the legislation to a system of presumed consent to address organ shortage?我们是否需要将立法改为推定同意制度来解决器官短缺问题?
Med Sci Law. 2010 Apr;50(2):84-94. doi: 10.1258/msl.2010.009016.
10
Lives and choices, give and take: Altruism and organ procurement.生命与选择,付出与索取:利他主义与器官获取。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):587-597. doi: 10.1177/0969733017710985. Epub 2017 Jul 26.