Tréluyer J M, Pons G
Pharmacologie périnatale et pédiatrique, hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul (Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), université René-Descartes, 82, avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75674 Paris, France.
Arch Pediatr. 2000 Dec;7(12):1330-8. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)00152-4.
Only a minority of the drugs administered to children and infants have a pediatric labeling and have been sufficiently tested for efficacy, safety and correct pediatric dosing, which cannot necessarily be extrapolated from adult data. This situation is scientifically and ethically unacceptable. To address this problem, the suggestion is being made in several countries that more formal legal requirements should be introduced. In the United States, in 1997, a new legislation encouraged pharmaceutical companies to study medicines in children (for example, by offering the financial incentive of a six-month extension to patent exclusivity). However, there are undeniable difficulties in pediatric and neonatal studies. To minimize the risks of clinical investigation in children, appropriate methodologies should be used. New in vitro and in vivo methods are now available, taking into account pediatric characteristics.
给予儿童和婴儿的药物中,只有少数有儿科标签,并且经过了充分的疗效、安全性和正确儿科剂量测试,儿科剂量不一定能从成人数据推断得出。这种情况在科学和伦理上是不可接受的。为解决这一问题,一些国家建议应引入更正式的法律要求。在美国,1997年一项新立法鼓励制药公司开展儿童药物研究(例如,通过提供专利独占期延长六个月的经济激励措施)。然而,儿科和新生儿研究存在不可否认的困难。为尽量降低儿童临床研究的风险,应采用适当的方法。考虑到儿科特征,现在已有新的体外和体内方法。