Mukamel D B, Mushlin A I
Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Jan;27(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27003-5.
Increasing competition in health care markets and ongoing pressures to contain costs raise concerns about possible deterioration in the quality of medical care. Publicly disseminated quality report cards are designed to inform consumers' choice of providers and health plans, thus counteracting incentives to provide low-quality care and improving the functioning of health care markets.
This article reviews and evaluates the published evidence on the impact of quality report cards on patients' choice of health care providers and health plans.
Studies found only minimal effect of quality report cards on patient referral choices. These findings can be explained by several study design issues and by the economic forces governing health care markets. They cannot be construed to imply that quality report cards are not effective.
Whether report cards are effective or not is still an unanswered question. Further efforts to improve the information contained in report cards and to make them more understandable could increase their effectiveness.
医疗保健市场竞争日益激烈,控制成本的持续压力引发了对医疗服务质量可能恶化的担忧。公开传播的质量报告卡旨在为消费者选择医疗服务提供者和健康保险计划提供信息,从而抵消提供低质量医疗服务的动机,并改善医疗保健市场的运作。
本文回顾并评估了已发表的关于质量报告卡对患者选择医疗服务提供者和健康保险计划影响的证据。
研究发现质量报告卡对患者转诊选择的影响微乎其微。这些发现可以通过几个研究设计问题以及医疗保健市场的经济力量来解释。不能将其解释为意味着质量报告卡无效。
报告卡是否有效仍然是一个未解决的问题。进一步努力改进报告卡中包含的信息并使其更易于理解,可能会提高其有效性。