Gran J T, Nordvåg B Y
Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Regional Hospital of Tromsø, Norway.
Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(6):450-4. doi: 10.1007/s100670070004.
Our objective was to study the demographic characteristics of patients referred from general practitioners to a rheumatology outpatient clinic and to analyse the content and quality of the referral letters. During a 12-month period 346 randomly chosen referral letters of new patients from GPs to a rheumatology outpatient clinic were evaluated. The mean age of the 346 referred patients (73.1% females and 26.9% males) was 45.5 years and 17.8% were 60 or older. Mean disease duration at the time of referral was 50.9 months (1-432 months). Only about 10% of the patients referred had a disease duration of 1 month or less. The current clinical problem was appropriately presented in 95% of the referral letters. In only 0.9% of referrals had there been a prior phone consultation. Altogether, 95.1% of the referrals were as a result of diagnosis or treatment, and in nearly half the cases a diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease was suggested. In 23% of the letters the result of clinical examinations were missing. Laboratory tests such as serum rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies and HLA-B27 were used by GPs to screen for rheumatic disease in general. A lack of correlation between clinical manifestations and subsequently requested laboratory examinations was frequently found in the referral letters, exemplified by the use of HLA-B27 in rheumatoid arthritis and serum rheumatoid factors in ankylosing spondylitis. These results show that among GPs the threshold for referring patients to a rheumatology outpatient clinic appears rather high, and that patients are subjected to long observation periods before referral. A more frequent use of phone consultations and an improvement in the diagnostic skills of GPs may positively influence the selection of patients for referral and shorten the long waiting lists in rheumatology. This need for improvement was further strengthened by GPs' inappropriate use of laboratory tests.
我们的目标是研究从全科医生转诊至风湿病门诊的患者的人口统计学特征,并分析转诊信的内容和质量。在为期12个月的时间里,对346封随机抽取的全科医生转诊至风湿病门诊的新患者转诊信进行了评估。346名被转诊患者的平均年龄为45.5岁(女性占73.1%,男性占26.9%),17.8%的患者年龄在60岁及以上。转诊时的平均病程为50.9个月(1 - 432个月)。只有约10%的被转诊患者病程为1个月或更短。95%的转诊信恰当地陈述了当前的临床问题。仅有0.9%的转诊病例之前有过电话咨询。总体而言,95.1%的转诊是出于诊断或治疗目的,近一半的病例提示为炎性风湿性疾病诊断。23%的信件缺少临床检查结果。全科医生通常使用血清类风湿因子、抗核抗体和HLA - B27等实验室检查来筛查风湿性疾病。在转诊信中经常发现临床表现与随后要求的实验室检查之间缺乏相关性,例如类风湿关节炎中使用HLA - B27以及强直性脊柱炎中使用血清类风湿因子。这些结果表明,在全科医生中,将患者转诊至风湿病门诊的门槛似乎相当高,而且患者在转诊前要经过很长的观察期。更频繁地使用电话咨询以及提高全科医生的诊断技能可能会对转诊患者的选择产生积极影响,并缩短风湿病科室漫长的等候名单。全科医生对实验室检查的不当使用进一步凸显了这种改进的必要性。