De Coster Carolyn, Fitzgerald Avril, Cepoiu Monica
Health Outcomes, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Nov;27(11):1411-6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0938-5. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
As part of a larger body of work to develop a rheumatology priority referral score, a literature review was conducted. The objective of the literature review was to identify preexisting priority-setting, triage, and referral tools/scales developed to guide referrals from primary care to specialist care/consultation usually provided by a rheumatologist. Using a combination of database, citation, Internet, and hand-searching, 20 papers were identified that related to referral prioritization in three areas: rheumatoid arthritis (RA; 5), musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases other than RA (3), and MSK diseases in general (12). No single set of priority-setting criteria was identified for rheumatologic disorders across the spectrum of patients who may be referred from primary care providers (PCPs) to rheumatologists. There appears to be more congruence on conditions at either end of the urgency spectrum with conditions such as suspected cranial arteritis or systemic vasculitis deemed to be emergency referrals and fibromyalgia and other soft-tissue syndromes deemed to be more routine referrals. Between these two extremes, there is a divergence of opinion about urgency and few papers on the issue. The exception to this is referral for early RA for which several criteria have been established. Despite the inherent complexities in developing a tool to prioritize patients referred by PCPs to rheumatologists, there are compelling reasons to proceed. With the aging of the population, the number of patients being referred to rheumatologists is expected to increase. With pharmaceutical advances, there are demonstrable benefits in early referral for some conditions. These trends have led to increased pressure on scarce rheumatological human resources. A tool to prioritize referrals is a critical component of improving access and the referral process.
作为制定风湿病优先转诊评分这一更大规模工作的一部分,我们进行了一项文献综述。该文献综述的目的是识别已有的用于指导从初级保健转诊至通常由风湿病学家提供的专科护理/会诊的优先排序、分诊和转诊工具/量表。通过综合运用数据库检索、引文检索、互联网检索和手工检索,我们确定了20篇与三个领域转诊优先排序相关的论文:类风湿关节炎(RA;5篇)、除RA之外的肌肉骨骼(MSK)疾病(3篇)以及一般MSK疾病(12篇)。对于可能从初级保健提供者(PCP)转诊至风湿病学家的各类患者,尚未确定一套统一的风湿病优先排序标准。对于紧急程度两端的病症,如疑似颅动脉炎或系统性血管炎被视为紧急转诊病例,而纤维肌痛和其他软组织综合征被视为更常规的转诊病例,意见似乎更为一致。在这两个极端之间,对于紧急程度存在意见分歧,且关于此问题的论文较少。早期RA的转诊是个例外,已经建立了一些标准。尽管开发一种用于对PCP转诊至风湿病学家的患者进行优先排序的工具存在内在复杂性,但仍有令人信服的理由继续推进。随着人口老龄化,转诊至风湿病学家的患者数量预计将会增加。随着药物的进步,对于某些病症,早期转诊具有明显的益处。这些趋势导致了对稀缺的风湿病人力资源的压力不断增加。一种用于转诊优先排序的工具是改善就医机会和转诊流程的关键组成部分。