Suppr超能文献

类风湿因子在基层医疗中有用吗?一项回顾性横断面研究。

Is rheumatoid factor useful in primary care? A retrospective cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jul;32(7):1089-93. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2236-0. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Abstract

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is frequently tested in general practice where its utility as a diagnostic test for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not known. We undertook a retrospective cross-sectioal study to determine the utility and cost of RF in a primary care population. We compared RF with recorded clinical features based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as a diagnostic test for RA in 235 patients in general practice using receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the cost of testing per case of RA. We analysed 36,191 RF requests made to one laboratory from 2003-2009 at a mean annual cost of £58,164 and the variation and annual cost of RF testing between 77 practices. The sensitivity and specificity of RF at the optimal cut-off value of 20 U/ml were 0.6 and 0.96 and that of two documented clinical ACR criteria were 0.9 and 0.92, respectively. No ACR criteria were documented in 150 (63.8%) patients who had RF tested. The overall cost of RF testing per case of seropositive RA was £708.75. Of all RF requests, 66.6% was made by GPs, 7.0% by rheumatologists and 26.4% by other hospital departments. The proportion of positive tests was 5.8% in primary care and 17.7% in rheumatology. The mean number of tests performed annually in primary care was 4.65 (SD 2.7) per 1,000 patients. RF is less sensitive for RA than clinical features in primary care and is frequently requested in cases without clinical evidence of the disease, adding to the overall cost.

摘要

类风湿因子(RF)在一般实践中经常进行测试,但它作为类风湿关节炎(RA)诊断测试的效用尚不清楚。我们进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,以确定 RF 在初级保健人群中的效用和成本。我们将 RF 与基于美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准的记录临床特征进行比较,作为 235 例普通实践患者的 RA 诊断测试,使用接收者操作特征曲线,并计算每例 RA 的测试成本。我们分析了 2003 年至 2009 年一家实验室对 36,191 次 RF 请求,平均每年花费 58,164 英镑,以及 77 个实践之间 RF 测试的变化和年度成本。在最佳截断值 20 U/ml 时,RF 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.6 和 0.96,两个记录的临床 ACR 标准分别为 0.9 和 0.92。在进行 RF 测试的 150 名(63.8%)患者中,没有记录任何 ACR 标准。每例血清阳性 RA 的 RF 测试总成本为 708.75 英镑。在所有 RF 请求中,66.6%由全科医生提出,7.0%由风湿病学家提出,26.4%由其他医院部门提出。初级保健中阳性测试的比例为 5.8%,风湿病学中为 17.7%。初级保健中每年进行的测试平均数量为每 1,000 名患者 4.65(SD 2.7)。RF 在初级保健中的 RA 敏感性低于临床特征,并且在没有疾病临床证据的情况下经常被要求,从而增加了总体成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验