Suppr超能文献

经验支持的心理干预:争议与证据。

Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence.

作者信息

Chambless D L, Ollendick T H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3270, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:685-716. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685.

Abstract

Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process.

摘要

在美国,为了增加循证心理治疗的实践,人们组建了特别工作组来定义、识别和传播有关实证支持的心理干预措施的信息。本文总结了美国、英国及其他地区几个此类特别工作组以及其他审查实证支持治疗方法(ESTs)的组织的工作,同时列出了已被确定为实证支持治疗方法的清单。此外,还回顾了围绕实证支持治疗方法识别和传播的争议,包括对研究方法、外部效度、实证支持治疗方法研究的实用性的担忧,以及实证支持治疗方法审查过程的可靠性和透明度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验