Suppr超能文献

经验支持的心理干预:争议与证据。

Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence.

作者信息

Chambless D L, Ollendick T H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3270, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:685-716. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685.

Abstract

Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process.

摘要

在美国,为了增加循证心理治疗的实践,人们组建了特别工作组来定义、识别和传播有关实证支持的心理干预措施的信息。本文总结了美国、英国及其他地区几个此类特别工作组以及其他审查实证支持治疗方法(ESTs)的组织的工作,同时列出了已被确定为实证支持治疗方法的清单。此外,还回顾了围绕实证支持治疗方法识别和传播的争议,包括对研究方法、外部效度、实证支持治疗方法研究的实用性的担忧,以及实证支持治疗方法审查过程的可靠性和透明度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验