Mihalick S M, Langlois J C, Krienke J D
Psychological Sciences Division, Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
J Comp Psychol. 2000 Dec;114(4):365-70. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.4.365.
In this study, the authors explored potential strain and sex differences in nonspatial cognitive ability. Beginning around 90 days of age, male and female C57BL/6J (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) inbred mice (Mus musculus) were tested on a task of simple odor discrimination learning with 3 repeated reversals. Males learned the task more readily than females, and DBA mice learned the task more readily than C57 mice. All differences became evident after repeated testing. Similarity of perseveration measures indicated the differences were not due to inhibitory deficits. Instead, a phase analysis localized differences to a transitional period of reversal learning. Females increased transitional errors that more likely indicated adaptive sampling strategies than memory failures. C57 females used this strategy indiscriminately, but DBA females sampled as a function of environmental uncertainty.
在本研究中,作者探讨了非空间认知能力方面潜在的品系和性别差异。从大约90日龄开始,对雄性和雌性C57BL/6J(C57)和DBA/2J(DBA)近交系小鼠(小家鼠)进行了一项简单气味辨别学习任务测试,该任务有3次重复反转。雄性比雌性更容易学会该任务,并且DBA小鼠比C57小鼠更容易学会该任务。所有差异在重复测试后变得明显。坚持性测量的相似性表明这些差异并非由于抑制缺陷。相反,阶段分析将差异定位到反转学习的一个过渡时期。雌性增加的过渡错误更可能表明是适应性采样策略而非记忆失败。C57雌性不加区分地使用这种策略,但DBA雌性根据环境不确定性进行采样。