Suppr超能文献

经验性使用抗生素治疗疑似肺炎对后续机会性肺部感染的影响。

Effects of empiric antibiotic administration for suspected pneumonia on subsequent opportunistic pulmonary infections.

作者信息

Koontz C S, Chang M C, Meredith J W

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1110-4; discussion 1114-5.

Abstract

Optimal guidelines for empiric antibiotic (EAB) therapy in cases of suspected post-traumatic ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are not well defined. EAB administration is thought to increase the incidence of opportunistic organisms; however, culture-directed (as opposed to empiric) treatment may delay antibiotic administration with possible adverse consequences. Our goal was to examine the impact of EAB administration on the incidence of subsequent VAP and opportunistic organisms in a series of critically injured patients with sepsis syndrome. This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who underwent multiple fiberoptic bronchoscopies (FOBs) for diagnosis of suspected VAP as the cause of postinjury sepsis syndrome. The relationships between EAB administration, positive cultures (>10(5) colony-forming units) at repeat FOB, and prevalence of opportunistic organisms (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas species, Acinetobacter species, and/or yeast) were evaluated. Over a 13-month period ending on January 1, 1999, 36 intubated trauma patients underwent more than one FOB during their intensive care unit stay. Twenty-nine patients received EAB immediately after the initial FOB. There was no difference in the rate of EAB administration in patients who developed subsequent VAP after initial FOB (19 of 24, 79%) versus those who did not develop VAP (10 of 12, 83%; P = 0.65). There were 30 VAPs diagnosed in 58 subsequent FOBs (i.e., after the initial FOB) of which 23 were due to an opportunistic organism compared with two VAPs due to an opportunistic organism diagnosed at initial FOB (P < 0.001). Twenty-one of the 23 opportunistic VAPs at subsequent FOBs had received EAB before the first FOB compared with four of seven nonopportunistic organisms (P = 0.06). Administration of EAB does not impact the incidence of subsequent VAP. However, EAB may be related to the development of subsequent opportunistic pulmonary infections.

摘要

对于疑似创伤后呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)病例的经验性抗生素(EAB)治疗,最佳指南尚未明确界定。人们认为使用EAB会增加机会性微生物的发生率;然而,基于培养结果的(与经验性相对)治疗可能会延迟抗生素的使用,从而可能产生不良后果。我们的目标是研究在一系列患有脓毒症综合征的重伤患者中,使用EAB对后续VAP和机会性微生物发生率的影响。这是一项对所有入住一级创伤中心的患者进行的回顾性研究,这些患者因疑似VAP是伤后脓毒症综合征的病因而接受了多次纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)。评估了EAB的使用、重复FOB时阳性培养结果(>10⁵菌落形成单位)与机会性微生物(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌、不动杆菌属和/或酵母菌)的患病率之间的关系。在截至1999年1月1日的13个月期间,36例插管创伤患者在重症监护病房住院期间接受了不止一次FOB检查。29例患者在首次FOB检查后立即接受了EAB治疗。首次FOB检查后发生后续VAP的患者(24例中的19例,79%)与未发生VAP的患者(12例中的10例,83%;P = 0.65)在EAB使用比例上没有差异。在58次后续FOB检查(即首次FOB检查之后)中诊断出30例VAP,其中23例是由机会性微生物引起的,而首次FOB检查时诊断出的由机会性微生物引起的VAP为2例(P < 0.001)。后续FOB检查时23例机会性VAP中有21例在首次FOB检查前接受了EAB治疗,而7例非机会性微生物引起的VAP中有4例接受了EAB治疗(P = 0.06)。使用EAB不会影响后续VAP的发生率。然而,EAB可能与后续机会性肺部感染的发生有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验