Shorr Andrew F, Combes Alain, Kollef Marin H, Chastre Jean
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):700-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201885.57697.21.
To determine the impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and to control for the effect of initially inappropriate antibiotic treatment on outcomes by focusing only on persons who were given appropriate antibiotic therapy for their infection.
Retrospective analysis of pooled, patient-level data from multiple clinical trials in VAP.
Multiple ICUs in France.
Persons with bronchoscopically confirmed VAP due to either MRSA or methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and who received initially appropriate antibiotic treatment. All persons with MRSA VAP received vancomycin (15 mg/kg intravenously, twice daily).
None.
We compared patients with MRSA VAP to persons with MSSA VAP. ICU length of stay represented the primary end point and ICU-free days served as a secondary end point. We recorded information regarding multiple confounders, including demographics, reasons for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (MV), severity of illness at both ICU admission and time of diagnosis of VAP, and duration of mechanical ventilation before and following the onset of VAP. The final cohort included 107 patients, and one third of cases were due to MRSA. Despite receiving initially appropriate antibiotic treatment, median ICU length of stay was significantly longer for persons with MRSA infection (33 days vs. 22 days; p=.047). The median number of ICU-free days was concomitantly lower in MRSA VAP (0 days vs. 5 days; p=.011). Survival analysis employing a Cox proportional hazards model identified several predictors of remaining in the ICU: Pao2/Fio2 ratio at diagnosis of VAP, duration of MV before VAP, duration of MV after diagnosis of VAP, and reason for MV. Additionally, infection with MRSA as opposed MSSA doubled the probability of needing continued ICU care (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.95; p=.025).
MRSA VAP independently prolongs the duration of ICU hospitalization, and in turn, increases overall costs, even for patients initially given appropriate antibiotic treatment. Confronting the adverse impact of MRSA will require efforts that address more than the initial antibiotic prescription.
确定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的影响,并仅关注接受了针对其感染的适当抗生素治疗的患者,以控制初始不适当抗生素治疗对结局的影响。
对VAP多项临床试验中汇总的患者层面数据进行回顾性分析。
法国的多个ICU。
经支气管镜检查确诊为VAP,由MRSA或甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)引起,且接受了初始适当抗生素治疗的患者。所有MRSA VAP患者均接受万古霉素治疗(静脉注射15mg/kg,每日两次)。
无。
我们将MRSA VAP患者与MSSA VAP患者进行了比较。ICU住院时间为主要终点,无ICU天数作为次要终点。我们记录了有关多个混杂因素的信息,包括人口统计学资料、入住ICU及机械通气(MV)的原因、入住ICU时及VAP诊断时的疾病严重程度,以及VAP发作前后的机械通气时间。最终队列包括107例患者,其中三分之一的病例由MRSA引起。尽管接受了初始适当的抗生素治疗,但MRSA感染患者的ICU中位住院时间明显更长(33天对22天;p=0.047)。MRSA VAP患者的无ICU天数中位数相应较低(0天对5天;p=0.011)。采用Cox比例风险模型进行的生存分析确定了留在ICU的几个预测因素:VAP诊断时的Pao2/Fio2比值、VAP发作前的MV时间、VAP诊断后的MV时间以及MV的原因。此外,与MSSA感染相比,MRSA感染使需要继续在ICU治疗的概率增加了一倍(风险比,2.08;95%置信区间,1.09-3.95;p=0.025)。
即使对于最初接受了适当抗生素治疗的患者,MRSA VAP也会独立延长ICU住院时间,进而增加总体费用。应对MRSA的不利影响需要采取比初始抗生素处方更多的措施。