Simmons P D
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Microsurgery. 2000;20(8):458-65. doi: 10.1002/1098-2752(2000)20:8<458::aid-micr19>3.0.co;2-g.
Ethical issues posed by the hand transplant program conducted by hand and plastic surgeons at Jewish and University Hospitals, Louisville, Kentucky, are examined in this essay. Because a composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is an experimental procedure, it raises issues as to the protection of human subjects. The background for the emergence of medical ethics as a discipline is indicated and the processes employed by the CTA team in order to address ethical concerns are discussed. Questions are posed as to the justifications for certain procedures and those pertaining to the goals of medicine, informed consent, and patient quality of life. Other issues include benefits versus risks, patient autonomy and medical paternalism or non-maleficence. The Louisville team seems to have dealt conscientiously with all ethical questions that have been posed and has treated the hand recipient with competence and continuity of care. No reasons based in ethical concerns have surfaced that would in any way discredit the program.
本文探讨了肯塔基州路易斯维尔市犹太医院和大学医院的手外科医生及整形外科医生开展的手部移植项目所引发的伦理问题。由于复合组织同种异体移植(CTA)是一种实验性手术,它引发了关于保护人类受试者的问题。文中指出了医学伦理学作为一门学科出现的背景,并讨论了CTA团队为解决伦理问题所采用的流程。文中还提出了关于某些手术的正当理由以及与医学目标、知情同意和患者生活质量相关的问题。其他问题包括益处与风险、患者自主权以及医学家长主义或不伤害原则。路易斯维尔团队似乎认真处理了所提出的所有伦理问题,并以专业能力和持续护理对待手部移植受者。尚未出现基于伦理担忧的理由会以任何方式诋毁该项目。