Riedel B W, Lichstein K L
The University of Memphis Prevention Center, TN 38119, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2001 Feb;39(2):201-12. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00002-4.
The methodology of assessing adherence to sleep restriction therapy for insomnia has received little attention in the empirical literature. The present study proposes and evaluates several approaches to assessing adherence to sleep restriction. We investigated multiple methods of measuring adherence and tested their utility by determining the strength of their association with treatment outcome in a sample of 22 older adults with insomnia (16 women, six men). As a group, the measures indicated reasonably good adherence to treatment recommendations. Time spent in bed was significantly reduced at post-treatment, and the night to night consistency of time spent in bed and arising time was significantly greater at post-treatment. However, time spent in bed per night at post-treatment still exceeded therapist recommendations by a mean of 27.89 min (SD=31.72). Greater consistency of time spent in bed per night and a more consistent arising time predicted a better treatment outcome. Measures of degree of bedtime reduction did not predict treatment outcome.
评估失眠症睡眠限制疗法依从性的方法在实证文献中很少受到关注。本研究提出并评估了几种评估睡眠限制依从性的方法。我们调查了多种测量依从性的方法,并通过确定它们与22名患有失眠症的老年人(16名女性,6名男性)样本中治疗结果的关联强度来测试它们的效用。总体而言,这些测量表明对治疗建议的依从性相当好。治疗后卧床时间显著减少,治疗后卧床时间和起床时间的夜间一致性显著提高。然而,治疗后每晚卧床时间仍比治疗师的建议平均超出27.89分钟(标准差=31.72)。每晚卧床时间的更高一致性和更一致的起床时间预示着更好的治疗结果。就寝时间减少程度的测量并不能预测治疗结果。