Niddam D M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen A C
Human Brain Mapping and Cortical Imaging Laboratory, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Brain Topogr. 2000 Winter;13(2):105-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1026655001804.
Early, middle and late latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by cutaneous electrical stimulation (painful vs. non-painful) of right and left hands were recorded. The aims were to study (1) if lifelong use of dominant right hand would result in different SEP topographies compared to non-dominant left hand stimulation, (2) if painful and non-painful stimuli resulted in different SEP activation patterns for the different latency components and (3) if these results were consistent between two areas of the hand. Electrical stimuli were applied cutaneously above the thenar and hypothenar muscles of the left and right hand. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to test the effects of laterality and intensity for a given peak amplitude and latency. Statistical results yielded no significant difference in peak amplitude for either thenar and hypothenar between the two hands. In contrast, a significant difference in amplitude was observed for 6 components for each stimulus location when the two intensities were compared. These components were found at early, middle and late latencies. No significant latency shift was observed between the two hands. Only the P30 component showed a significant latency shift for both locations with the painful condition having the shorter latency. Thus, life-long use of the dominant hand does not generate detectable changes in cortical evoked activity to sensory input from the skin above thenar and hypothenar muscles. Several SEP components across the time course (0-400 ms) showed increased amplitude when the stimulus was increased from non-painful to painful intensity.
记录了通过对右手和左手进行皮肤电刺激(疼痛性与非疼痛性)所诱发的早、中、晚潜伏期体感诱发电位(SEP)。目的是研究:(1)与非优势左手刺激相比,终生使用优势右手是否会导致SEP地形图不同;(2)疼痛性和非疼痛性刺激对于不同潜伏期成分是否会导致不同的SEP激活模式;以及(3)这些结果在手部的两个区域之间是否一致。电刺激施加于左手和右手大鱼际肌和小鱼际肌上方的皮肤。使用双向重复测量方差分析来测试给定峰值幅度和潜伏期的偏侧性和强度的影响。统计结果显示,双手之间大鱼际肌和小鱼际肌的峰值幅度均无显著差异。相比之下,当比较两种强度时,在每个刺激部位的6个成分中观察到幅度有显著差异。这些成分出现在早、中、晚潜伏期。双手之间未观察到显著的潜伏期偏移。只有P30成分在两个部位均显示出显著的潜伏期偏移,疼痛条件下的潜伏期较短。因此,终生使用优势手不会在大脑皮层对来自大鱼际肌和小鱼际肌上方皮肤的感觉输入的诱发活动中产生可检测到的变化。当刺激从非疼痛强度增加到疼痛强度时,在整个时间过程(0 - 400毫秒)中的几个SEP成分显示出幅度增加。