Svensson P, Beydoun A, Morrow T J, Casey K L
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, Royal Dental College, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;104(4):343-50. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00026-9.
The present study compared the cerebral processing of non-painful and painful cutaneous CO2 laser stimulation and intramuscular electrical stimulation in 11 normal subjects. The overall wave form morphology of the long-latency evoked potentials (EPs) at the central vertex (Cz) was identical and surface topographic mappings of the 21-channel recordings showed similar distributions, suggesting involvement of common neural generators. However, the EPs caused by intramuscular stimulation differed from cutaneous stimulation in several distinct ways. First, the latency of the major positive and negative components were significantly shorter with intramuscular stimulation (N 128-145 ms; P 274-298 ms) compared to cutaneous stimulation (N 235-286 ms; P 371-383 ms) (P < 0.001). Second, the peak-to-peak amplitude and root-mean-square values of intramuscular EPs recorded at Cz showed a ceiling effect in the painful range, whereas the laser EPs continued to increase in this range. Third, painful intramuscular, but not non-painful, stimulation caused a frontal activity which not was observed with cutaneous laser stimulation at any intensity. Conduction velocity measurements indicated activation of nociceptive A-delta afferents with cutaneous laser stimulation (10.2 +/- 0.2 m/s) and activation of a mixed nerve fiber population with intramuscular electrical stimulation (65.8 +/- 25.8 m/s). Differences between laser and intramuscular EPs may be due to different types and origins of activated afferent fibers. Laser EPs can be used specifically to assess cutaneous A-delta fiber function, whereas intramuscular EPs reflect the cerebral processing of a mixed afferent input from muscle tissue.
本研究比较了11名正常受试者在接受非疼痛性和疼痛性皮肤二氧化碳激光刺激及肌肉内电刺激时的大脑处理过程。中央顶点(Cz)处长潜伏期诱发电位(EPs)的总体波形形态相同,21通道记录的表面地形图显示分布相似,提示有共同的神经发生器参与。然而,肌肉内刺激引起的EPs与皮肤刺激在几个明显方面存在差异。首先,与皮肤刺激相比,肌肉内刺激时主要正负成分的潜伏期明显更短(N 128 - 145毫秒;P 274 - 298毫秒),而皮肤刺激时为(N 235 - 286毫秒;P 371 - 383毫秒)(P < 0.001)。其次,在Cz处记录的肌肉内EPs的峰峰值幅度和均方根值在疼痛范围内呈现天花板效应,而激光EPs在此范围内持续增加。第三,疼痛性肌肉内刺激而非非疼痛性刺激会引起一种额叶活动,在任何强度的皮肤激光刺激下均未观察到这种活动。传导速度测量表明,皮肤激光刺激激活了伤害性A - δ传入神经(10.2 +/- 0.2米/秒),肌肉内电刺激激活了混合神经纤维群(65.8 +/- 25.8米/秒)。激光和肌肉内EPs之间的差异可能归因于激活的传入纤维的不同类型和起源。激光EPs可专门用于评估皮肤A - δ纤维功能,而肌肉内EPs反映了来自肌肉组织的混合传入输入的大脑处理过程。