Niddam D M, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen A C
Human Brain Mapping and Cortical Imaging Laboratory, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Brain Topogr. 2001 Summer;13(4):283-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1011180713285.
Little is known about somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from muscle stimulation compared to that from skin stimulation. The current study examined this issue in the full SEP spectrum (0-440 ms). The aims of the study were to (1) establish the dynamics of early to late latency SEPs from intramuscular stimulation in contrast to surface stimulation, (2) compare the effect of non-painful and painful stimuli on SEP latencies and amplitudes of the two methods, and (3) investigate to which extent these results can be shared between the median nerve innervated thenar site and ulnar nerve innervated hypothenar site. Stimuli were delivered (2 Hz) at a non-painful and a painful intensity above or within the thenar and hypothenar muscles of the hand. Maximas of the SEPs were extracted by a combination of global field power and visual inspection of the topographies. Amplitudes and latencies of the maximas were analysed by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. In the early phase (0-50 ms) the topographic patterns showed different dynamics between surface and intramuscular stimulation and in the late phase (100- 440 ms) prolonged latencies were found for intramuscular stimulation. Apart from this, similar topographic patterns and time sequences were obtained. Significant higher SEP amplitudes for most of the isolated components (C4'/P25, Fz/N35, C4'/P45, Fc2/N65, P4/P90, T4/N137, F3/P150, Cz/P240-P270) were found with surface stimulation compared to intramuscular stimulation. In contrast to surface stimulation, intramuscular stimulation at a stimulation frequency of 2 Hz did not result in a differentiation in amplitude for any of the isolated components. These results indicate differences in the early and late processing of sensory input from skin and muscle.
与皮肤刺激诱发的体感诱发电位(SEP)相比,肌肉刺激诱发的SEP鲜为人知。本研究在完整的SEP频谱(0 - 440毫秒)范围内对这一问题进行了研究。该研究的目的是:(1)确定与表面刺激相比,肌肉内刺激诱发的早至晚期潜伏期SEP的动态变化;(2)比较非疼痛性和疼痛性刺激对两种方法SEP潜伏期和波幅的影响;(3)研究这些结果在正中神经支配的鱼际部位和尺神经支配的小鱼际部位之间的共享程度。在手的鱼际肌和小鱼际肌上方或内部,以非疼痛性和疼痛性强度(2赫兹)施加刺激。通过全局场功率和地形图目视检查相结合的方法提取SEP的最大值。对最大值的波幅和潜伏期进行重复测量的双向方差分析。在早期阶段(0 - 50毫秒),地形图模式显示表面刺激和肌肉内刺激之间存在不同的动态变化,在晚期阶段(100 - 440毫秒),发现肌肉内刺激的潜伏期延长。除此之外,获得了相似的地形图模式和时间序列。与肌肉内刺激相比,表面刺激在大多数孤立成分(C4'/P25、Fz/N35、C4'/P45、Fc2/N65、P4/P90、T4/N137、F3/P150、Cz/P240 - P270)上的SEP波幅显著更高。与表面刺激不同,2赫兹刺激频率下的肌肉内刺激在任何孤立成分的波幅上均未导致差异。这些结果表明皮肤和肌肉感觉输入的早期和晚期处理存在差异。