Freise J, Gérard H C, Bunke T, Whittum-Hudson J A, Zeidler H, Köhler L, Hudson A P, Kuipers J G
Division of Rheumatology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl Neuberg Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.140.
Molecular biology techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are routinely used in research for detection of C trachomatis DNA in synovial samples, and these methods are now in use in some clinical laboratories. This study aimed at determining the method best suited to molecular diagnosis of C trachomatis by examining four standard DNA preparation methods using chlamydia spiked synovial tissue and chlamydia infected monocytes.
Synovial tissue from a chlamydia negative patient with rheumatoid arthritis was spiked with defined numbers of C trachomatis elementary bodies (EB). Purified human peripheral monocytes from normal donors were infected with the organism at a multiplicity of infection 1:1 in vitro and harvested after four days. DNA was prepared from all samples by four methods: (1) QIAmp tissue kit; (2) homogenisation in 65 degrees C phenol; (3) incubation at 97 degrees C; (4) proteinase K digestion at 97 degrees C. DNA from methods 1 and 2 was subjected to PCR using two different primer sets, each targeting the C trachomatis omp1 gene. LCR was done on DNA prepared by each method.
In synovial tissue samples spiked with EB, and in monocytes persistently infected with the organism, preparation of template using the QIAmp tissue kit (method 1) and the hot phenol extraction technique (method 2) allowed sensitive detection of C trachomatis DNA. These methods also produced template from both sample types for LCR. DNA prepared by heat denaturation (method 3) allowed only low sensitivity chlamydia detection in LCR and did not work at all for PCR. Proteinase K digestion plus heat denaturation (method 4) gave template that did not allow amplification in either PCR or LCR assays.
The sensitivity of detection for C trachomatis DNA in synovial tissue by PCR and LCR depends strongly on the method used for preparation of the amplification template. LCR targeting the multicopy chlamydial plasmid and two nested PCR assay systems targeting the single copy omp1 gene showed roughly equivalent sensitivity. Importantly, template preparation method and the specific PCR primer system used for screening must be optimised in relation to one another for highest sensitivity.
聚合酶链反应(PCR)和连接酶链反应(LCR)等分子生物学技术常用于滑膜样本中沙眼衣原体DNA检测的研究,目前一些临床实验室也在使用这些方法。本研究旨在通过使用沙眼衣原体加标的滑膜组织和沙眼衣原体感染的单核细胞检测四种标准DNA制备方法,确定最适合沙眼衣原体分子诊断的方法。
从一名衣原体阴性的类风湿性关节炎患者获取滑膜组织,加入一定数量的沙眼衣原体原体(EB)。将正常供体纯化的人外周血单核细胞在体外以感染复数1:1感染该病原体,四天后收获。所有样本采用四种方法制备DNA:(1)QIAmp组织试剂盒;(2)在65℃苯酚中匀浆;(3)在97℃孵育;(4)在97℃用蛋白酶K消化。方法1和2的DNA使用两种不同的引物组进行PCR,每组引物靶向沙眼衣原体omp1基因。对每种方法制备的DNA进行LCR。
在加入EB的滑膜组织样本以及持续感染该病原体的单核细胞中,使用QIAmp组织试剂盒(方法1)和热酚提取技术(方法2)制备模板能够灵敏地检测到沙眼衣原体DNA。这些方法还能从两种样本类型中制备用于LCR的模板。通过热变性制备的DNA(方法3)在LCR中仅能低灵敏度地检测到衣原体,且对PCR完全无效。蛋白酶K消化加热变性(方法4)得到的模板在PCR或LCR检测中均无法扩增。
PCR和LCR检测滑膜组织中沙眼衣原体DNA的灵敏度很大程度上取决于扩增模板的制备方法。靶向多拷贝衣原体质粒的LCR和靶向单拷贝omp1基因的两种巢式PCR检测系统显示出大致相当的灵敏度。重要的是,模板制备方法和用于筛查的特定PCR引物系统必须相互优化,以实现最高灵敏度。