Bordenave G R, Babinet C
Ann Immunol (Paris). 1979 Mar-Apr;130(2):181-97.
We obtained two allophenic rabbits formed by the manipulation of blastocysts from strains which differed by their coat colour and their immunoglobulin allotypic specificities. The phenotype of these two rabbits was a1,a2,a3,b4. They were chimeras for their lymphocytic system but not for their coat colour as they had the homogeneous brown coat colour of one of their parental strain. The IgG concentration in the serum of these allophenic rabbits was of the same order of magnitude as the IgG concentration in the serum of normal rabbits of the same age. Twenty-five weeks after birth, one of the allophenic rabbits expressed predominantly the a1 allotypic specificity (around 70% a1, 5% a2, 20% a3) which came from its brown parents, while the second one expressed predominantly the a3 allotypic specificity (around 2% a1, 20% a2, 60% a3) which came from its white parents. Each allotypically different IgG produced by these allophenic rabbits possessed the whole set of allotypic determinants found on IgG carrying the same specificity and produced by normal rabbits. We did not find significant signs of genetic information transfers from the cells of one parental strain to the cells of the other parental strain, or of eventual perturbations of the functional haploidy of the immunoglobulin-producing cells. As these allophenic rabbits only had different a series allotypic specificities, the probability of finding such signs was certainly low as they would have implied hybrid IgG molecules with two allotypically different heavy chains. We now have allophenic rabbits in which different a and b series allotypic specificities are involved and with which we will look for hybrid IgG molecules with heavy chains from one parental strain and light chains from the other parental strain. With these two rabbits we observed the "chimeric drift", namely the slow disappearance of constituants (here one allotypic specificity) coming from one parental strain. The first progeny tests carried out with these allophenic rabbits indicated that they did not seem to be chimeras at the germinal cell level. All their first offspring which were homogeneously brown and homozygous a1,b4 expressed the whole set of variants and determinants of the a1 or the b4 allotypic specificity.
我们获得了两只通过对来自毛色和免疫球蛋白异型特异性不同品系的囊胚进行操作而形成的异表型兔。这两只兔的表型为a1,a2,a3,b4。它们在淋巴细胞系统方面是嵌合体,但毛色并非嵌合,因为它们具有亲本品系之一的均匀棕色被毛。这些异表型兔血清中的IgG浓度与同龄正常兔血清中的IgG浓度处于同一数量级。出生25周后,其中一只异表型兔主要表达来自其棕色亲本的a1异型特异性(约70%为a1,5%为a2,20%为a3),而另一只主要表达来自其白色亲本的a3异型特异性(约2%为a1,20%为a2,60%为a3)。这些异表型兔产生的每种异型不同的IgG都具有在正常兔产生的携带相同特异性的IgG上发现的全套异型决定簇。我们没有发现遗传信息从一个亲本品系的细胞转移到另一个亲本品系的细胞的显著迹象,也没有发现免疫球蛋白产生细胞功能单倍体最终受到干扰的迹象。由于这些异表型兔仅具有不同的a系列异型特异性,发现此类迹象的可能性肯定很低,因为这意味着会有具有两条异型不同重链的杂交IgG分子。我们现在有了涉及不同a和b系列异型特异性的异表型兔,我们将用它们寻找具有来自一个亲本品系的重链和来自另一个亲本品系的轻链的杂交IgG分子。用这两只兔我们观察到了“嵌合漂移”,即来自一个亲本品系的成分(这里是一种异型特异性)的缓慢消失。对这些异表型兔进行的首次子代测试表明,它们在生殖细胞水平上似乎不是嵌合体。它们所有均匀棕色且纯合a1,b4的第一代后代都表达了a1或b4异型特异性的全套变体和决定簇。