Halwachs-Baumann G, Wilders-Truschnig M, Enzinger G, Eibl M, Linkesch W, Dornbusch H J, Santner B I, Marth E, Kessler H H
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
J Clin Virol. 2001 Jan;20(1-2):49-57. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(00)00155-4.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a major threat in transplant recipients. In recent years, new assays for routine CMV diagnosis, based on molecular techniques, have become available.
The impact of molecular assays for CMV diagnosis in transplant recipient was evaluated.
A total of 51 transplant recipients were screened for CMV infection. Serological (AxSYM CMV IgG and recombinant CMV IgM assays), antigenemia, CMV DNA (qualitative in house PCR and the quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test), and CMV mRNA (NucliSens CMV pp67 Test) tests were compared.
In 11/20 bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients and 10/31 renal transplant (RTX) recipients there was no evidence of active CMV infection. Ten RTX recipients and one BMT recipient were antigenemia positive, 21 RTX and seven BMT recipients were PCR positive (qualitative CMV PCR). There were more BMT recipients CMV DNA positive in serum (7/21) than antigenemia positive (1/21). CMV mRNA was found positive in two BMT recipients (one case with no other evidence of CMV infection, the other one CMV DNA positive and antigenemia negative). The only antigenemia positive BMT recipient was found negative for CMV mRNA, but positive in all other tests. Eight RTX recipients were found positive for CMV mRNA. Six of them were also antigenemia positive and five of those were also found positive for CMV IgM. One CMV mRNA positive RTX recipient was CMV IgM positive but antigenemia negative and the other one CMV mRNA positive RTX recipient was found negative in all other tests. Two antigenemia positive RTX recipients were found negative for mRNA and CMV IgM.
Antigenemia was found to be a good screening test for CMV infection in RTX recipients. In BMT recipients, tests based on molecular techniques appeared to be superior compared to antigenemia.
巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染是移植受者面临的主要威胁。近年来,基于分子技术的用于常规CMV诊断的新检测方法已可获得。
评估分子检测方法对移植受者CMV诊断的影响。
共对51名移植受者进行CMV感染筛查。比较了血清学检测(AxSYM CMV IgG和重组CMV IgM检测)、抗原血症检测、CMV DNA检测(内部定性PCR和定量COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR检测)以及CMV mRNA检测(NucliSens CMV pp67检测)。
在20名骨髓移植(BMT)受者中的11名以及31名肾移植(RTX)受者中的10名中,没有活动性CMV感染的证据。10名RTX受者和1名BMT受者抗原血症呈阳性,21名RTX受者和7名BMT受者PCR呈阳性(定性CMV PCR)。血清中CMV DNA呈阳性的BMT受者(7/21)比抗原血症呈阳性的(1/21)更多。在2名BMT受者中发现CMV mRNA呈阳性(1例无其他CMV感染证据,另1例CMV DNA呈阳性且抗原血症呈阴性)。唯一抗原血症呈阳性的BMT受者CMV mRNA检测呈阴性,但其他所有检测均呈阳性。8名RTX受者CMV mRNA检测呈阳性。其中6名抗原血症也呈阳性,这些人中5名CMV IgM也呈阳性。1名CMV mRNA呈阳性的RTX受者CMV IgM呈阳性但抗原血症呈阴性,另1名CMV mRNA呈阳性的RTX受者其他所有检测均呈阴性。2名抗原血症呈阳性的RTX受者mRNA和CMV IgM检测呈阴性。
发现抗原血症是RTX受者CMV感染的良好筛查检测方法。在BMT受者中,基于分子技术的检测方法似乎比抗原血症检测更具优势。