Jack A I, Shallice T
Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, WC1N 3AR, London, UK.
Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):161-96. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00128-1.
Most 'theories of consciousness' are based on vague speculations about the properties of conscious experience. We aim to provide a more solid basis for a science of consciousness. We argue that a theory of consciousness should provide an account of the very processes that allow us to acquire and use information about our own mental states - the processes underlying introspection. This can be achieved through the construction of information-processing models that can account for 'Type-C' processes. Type-C processes can be specified experimentally by identifying paradigms in which awareness of the stimulus is necessary for an intentional action. The Shallice (1988b) framework is put forward as providing an initial account of Type-C processes, which can relate perceptual consciousness to consciously performed actions. Further, we suggest that this framework may be refined through the investigation of the functions of prefrontal cortex. The formulation of our approach requires us to consider fundamental conceptual and methodological issues associated with consciousness. The most significant of these issues concerns the scientific use of introspective evidence. We outline and justify a conservative methodological approach to the use of introspective evidence, with attention to the difficulties historically associated with its use in psychology.
大多数“意识理论”是基于对意识体验属性的模糊猜测。我们旨在为意识科学提供更坚实的基础。我们认为,意识理论应该解释那些使我们能够获取和利用关于自身心理状态信息的过程——即内省背后的过程。这可以通过构建能够解释“C类”过程的信息处理模型来实现。C类过程可以通过识别这样的范式来实验性地确定,在这些范式中,对刺激的觉知对于有意行动是必要的。提出了沙利斯(1988b)的框架,作为对C类过程的初步解释,该框架可以将知觉意识与有意识执行的行动联系起来。此外,我们认为这个框架可能会通过对前额叶皮层功能的研究而得到完善。我们方法的阐述要求我们考虑与意识相关的基本概念和方法论问题。其中最重要的问题涉及内省证据的科学运用。我们概述并论证了一种使用内省证据的保守方法论方法,并关注历史上与之在心理学中运用相关的困难。